News President Obama Says No Need for Congressional Authorization for Libya

  • Thread starter Thread starter CAC1001
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
President Obama stated that U.S. military involvement in Libya does not require Congressional authorization due to its limited nature under the War Powers Act. The discussion highlights concerns about the erosion of checks and balances, with participants questioning whether the President's actions could lead to a dictatorship. Some argue that military action, regardless of its intent to protect civilians, constitutes war and should require Congressional approval. The recognition of Libyan rebels by some countries is mentioned, but skepticism remains about the legitimacy of such recognition. Overall, the thread reflects deep concerns about the implications of executive power and adherence to constitutional law in military engagements.
  • #51
loseyourname said:
Okay, I was apparently confused about that. I looked it up again and treaties can give the federal government authority to legislate in matters that would otherwise be the exclusive domain of the states according to the Constitution, but treaties cannot otherwise directly contradict the Constitution.

I'd argue that Congress can create legislation that contradicts the Constitution. But because of the way our system is setup, it can be contested and taken to SCOTUS to determine actual Constitutionality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Back
Top