Press Tonnage (No Flywheel)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob Warren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flywheel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating press tonnage without a flywheel, specifically using a crank with a stroke of 2 inches and a speed of 300 strokes per minute. The torque is specified as 24,000 pound-inches, translating to 12 short ton-inches. The calculated ram force is approximately 48.25 short tons after considering mechanical advantage and the connecting rod's diagonal length. Key factors such as the free body diagram, ram dimensions, and material properties are emphasized as critical for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free body diagrams
  • Knowledge of torque calculations in inch-pounds
  • Familiarity with mechanical advantage concepts
  • Basic principles of press mechanics and tonnage calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of free body diagrams in mechanical engineering
  • Learn about torque and its applications in press design
  • Research mechanical advantage calculations and their implications
  • Explore the effects of material properties on press tonnage and performance
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, press operators, and anyone involved in the design and calculation of mechanical presses will benefit from this discussion.

Bob Warren
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Looking for the resulting tonnage of press ram.
1726677110851.png


2.00" of Stroke and 300 strokes per minute.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-09-18 113355.png
    Screenshot 2024-09-18 113355.png
    8.7 KB · Views: 55
Engineering news on Phys.org
1/32" from BDC
 
Is this homework? If so, we can move it.

To calculate forces, you start with a free body diagram (search the term). Every calculation in this problem requires getting the free body diagram correct. There are other considerations that will enter the problem at a later stage, but nothing will make sense until the free body diagram is correct. So start there, and we will assist as needed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Since you specify torque as inch pounds, and the crank radius conveniently as one inch, I assume you are using US customary units, so want an answer in short tons.
The crank torque of 24,000 pound⋅inch = 12 ton⋅inch.
My estimate is; 12 / Sin( Acos( -31/32 ) ) = 48.37 ton(short).
But I certainly would not trust it without a diagram.
 
ram, dimensions, die opening width, material thickness, type of material, bending rate to name a few
 
Last edited:
Ranger Mike said:
Define the problem. You offer no specs on the ram. No data.
What more do you need that is not provided in the diagram or text ?
 
Ranger Mike said:
ram, dimensions, die opening width, material thickness, type of material, bending rate to name a few
Ram dimensions: determine pressure, not total tonnage.
Die opening width: As above, irrelevant, the throw on the crank is ±1", so the opening will be a maximum of 2" high.
Material thickness: is not important as; 1/32" above BDC has been specified.
Type of material: Bending rate: Irrelevant.

The torque of 24,000 pound·inch is 12.0 short ton·inch.
The crank throw is 2” total, so the crank follows; y = 1” * Cos(theta) .
TDC will be at 0°, with BDC at 180° .
The work will first be done at; y = 1/32” above BDC, then ;
Theta = Acos( -31/32 ) = Acos( -0.96875 ) = 165.638°.
Mechanical advantage is the reciprocal of the slope of the Cos() function, = Sin() ;
1 / Sin( theta ) = 1 / 0.248 = 4.0316 advantage.
So the ram force will be 12 * 4.0316 = 48.38 ton(short).

That ignores the connecting rod diagonal length of 13” when offset 0.248” which will lower the tonnage slightly. A crude estimate is; (13” - 1/32”) / 13” = 99.76% .
So the; 48.38 becomes 48.25 ton(short).

The die, below the work, should be sprung to protect the crank and bearings. That cushion must begin to compress before 48.25 ton, which will set the actual limit to the press tonnage applied to the work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K