Primary magnetizing impedance of non-ideal transformer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the primary magnetizing inductance and core shunt resistance of a real transformer using measured voltage and current data. Participants clarify that when the secondary winding is open, the only current observed is due to the magnetizing impedance, which consists of the core resistance (Rcore) and magnetizing inductance (Lprim). They emphasize the importance of measuring no-load power using a wattmeter to calculate core losses, and provide formulas for calculating magnetizing reactance (Xm) and resistance (Ro) based on the measured data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformer equivalent circuits
  • Knowledge of magnetizing impedance components (Rcore, Lprim)
  • Familiarity with AC voltage and current measurements
  • Experience with wattmeter usage for power measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate core losses in transformers using wattmeter data
  • Study the impact of open secondary conditions on transformer behavior
  • Explore SPICE modeling for transformer circuits
  • Investigate the relationship between magnetizing impedance and core losses
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, power system analysts, and students studying transformer design and performance optimization will benefit from this discussion.

Vikas Kasireddy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am trying to determine the primary magnetizing inductance + core shunt resistance of a transformer. I attached the equivalent circuit of the transformer. I left the secondary open and have an AC voltage on the primary. This causes the coupling leakage inductance and coil resistance to appear as zero. How to I get the magnetizing inductance and resistance from measured V, I (sense resistor 10ohm )data.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-02-26 at 3.30.10 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-02-26 at 3.30.10 PM.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 1,294
Engineering news on Phys.org
Vikas Kasireddy said:
I am trying to determine the primary magnetizing inductance + core shunt resistance of a transformer. I attached the equivalent circuit of the transformer. I left the secondary open and have an AC voltage on the primary. This causes the coupling leakage inductance and coil resistance to appear as zero. How to I get the magnetizing inductance and resistance from measured V, I (sense resistor 10ohm )data.
Welcome to the PF.

That model circuit looks wrong to me. Can you link to where you saw it? If the secondary winding is open, you will mainly see the input leakage inductance Lk in series with the magnetizing inductance Lm, and the primary loss terms will interact as well...
 
Vikas Kasireddy said:
http://nptel.ac.in/courses/Webcourse-contents/IIT-KANPUR/power-system/chapter_1/1_18.html

Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought when the secondary is open, no current passes through the primary of the ideal transformer part. The only current we see is due to the magnetizing resistance and inductance.
Sorry, are you asking about an ideal transformer or a real transformer? I thought you were asking about a real transformer.
 
Vikas Kasireddy said:
magnetizing resistance
And I don't know what you mean by that term...
 
Yes, my question is about a real transformer. Equivalent circuit of a real transformer has the following components,
Rcore and Lprim for magnetizing impedance
R coil resistance and leakage inductance due to windings
Ideal transformer.
I know when the secondary is open, no current passes through the primary winding of the ideal transformer in the equivalence circuit diagram. Hence no current passes through Rs and Ls. The only current is through the primary magnetizing impedance Rcore and Lprim. I have data for V and I across primary winding. All I need to understand is how to calculate inductance and resistance from V I data
 
berkeman said:
This would be more like the model I'' used to using in SPICE (although it may reduce to what you are asking about)...

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/TREQCCT.jpg
TREQCCT.jpg

I was told that Rp and Xp can be shifted to after Rc and Xm terms since the current Io is very much less than Is. This is where the equivalent circuit I suggested comes from.
 
Vikas Kasireddy said:
since the current Io is very much less than Is

Not true when ##I_s=0##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy and cnh1995
  • #10
Vikas Kasireddy said:
I was told that Rp and Xp can be shifted to after Rc and Xm terms since the current Io is very much less than Is
As anorlunda said, this is not true when Is=0. You should keep the primary impedance "before" the magnetizing branch. But when the secondary is open, values of Xm and Rc are very much greater than R1 and X1, hence, the drop across primary impedance is neglected.
Vikas Kasireddy said:
The only current we see is due to the magnetizing resistance and inductance.
What you are calling as megnatizing resistance actually represents core losses.
Connect a wattmeter in the primary and measure the no-load power W consumed at rated primary voltage. The power recorded W by the wattmeter is the core loss at rated voltage.
Zo=Vo/Io
cosΦo=W/VoIo.
Xm=ZosinΦo and
Ro=ZocosΦo.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vikas Kasireddy and jim hardy
  • #11
Thanks guys! I did consider the primary windings inductance and resistance for open secondary and it makes sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
Replies
64
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
12K