MHB Principle Ideal in F[x] & Primitive nth root of unity

mathjam0990
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Let ζ5 be e2πi/5. Find a monic polynomial of degree two in K(ζ + ζ−1)

So, if E/F is a field extension, with α∈E then K(α) = {f(x)∈F[x] | f(α)=0} and m(x) is the minimal polynomial of α over F such that K(α) = [m(x)] where [m(x)] is the ideal generated by m(x).

I was thinking maybe (x- ζ - ζ−1)(x + ζ - ζ−1). Sorry I am not sure how to approach this exactly but I know of course ζ + ζ−1 should be a root of this degree 2 polynomial with the x2 coefficient as 1.

If anyone could provide an explanation that would be very helpful. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope you meant "irreducible monic polynomial", as there are several monic polynomials that are possible (take any monic quadratic from $\Bbb Q[x]$, for example).

You also don't say what "$K$" is, which is important. There are lots and lots of fields, and reducibility depends in an essential way on "which field we're in".

I will pretend $K = \Bbb Q$, the rational numbers.

First, some preliminary facts about $\zeta = e^{\frac{2\pi i}{5}}$:

Note that $\zeta^5 = 1$ which implies $\zeta^{-1} = \zeta^4$.

From $\zeta^5 = 1$ it is evident that $(\zeta^k)^5 = \zeta^{5k} = (\zeta^5)^k = 1^k = 1$. It is easy to see that:

$\zeta,\zeta^2,\zeta^3,\zeta^4$ are all distinct (use trigonometry) and thus that:

$1,\zeta,\zeta^2,\zeta^3,\zeta^4$ are 5 distinct roots of $x^5 - 1$, and thus that $\Bbb Q(\zeta)$ is the splitting field of:

$\dfrac{x^5 - 1}{x - 1} = x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1$.

The RHS is the 5th cyclotomic polynomial, and these are all irreducible over $\Bbb Q$. This is a non-trivial theorem, but the proof for the $p$-th cyclotomic polynomial (for a prime $p$) is somewhat easier. I will not prove this here, we can discuss it later, if you like.

So, evidently:

$x^4 + x ^3 + x^2 + x + 1 = (x - \zeta)(x - \zeta^2)(x - \zeta^3)(x - \zeta^4)$.

Thus this polynomial ($\Phi_5(x)$) is separable, and since adjoining one root gives us the entire splitting field, it is a Galois extension of $\Bbb Q$ (it is separable, and normal). So the Galois group is the same as $\text{Aut}(\Bbb Q(\zeta)/\Bbb Q)$, and has order 4.

Since $\sigma:\Bbb Q(\zeta) \to \Bbb Q(\zeta)$ defined by $\sigma(\zeta) = \zeta^2$ is an element of this group, and has order 4:

$\sigma^2(\zeta) = \sigma(\sigma(\zeta)) = \sigma(\zeta^2) = (\sigma(\zeta))^2 = \zeta^4$
$\sigma^3(\zeta) = \sigma(\sigma^2(\zeta)) = \sigma(\zeta^4) = (\sigma(\zeta))^4 = \zeta^8 = \zeta^3$
$\sigma^4(\zeta) = \sigma(\sigma^3(\zeta)) = \sigma(\zeta^3) = (\sigma(\zeta))^3 = \zeta^6 = \zeta$

we see this group is cyclic. By the Galois correspondence, we see that since we have just ONE subgroup of order 2 (namely: $\{\text{id},\sigma^2\}$), we have just one subfield of $\Bbb Q(\zeta)$ of dimension 2 over $\Bbb Q$ as a vector space. We will see shortly, that that field is $\Bbb Q(\zeta+\zeta^{-1})$.

Our automorphism group can be regarded as a permutation group acting on the roots of $x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1$, in this case, we have that:

$\sigma \mapsto (1\ 2\ 4\ 3)$
$\sigma^2 \mapsto (1\ 4)(2\ 3)$
$\sigma^3 \mapsto (1\ 3\ 4\ 2)$
$\sigma^4 \mapsto e$

So the subfield we are looking for is the field fixed by $\{\text{id}, \sigma^2\}$, which suggests grouping the polynomial factors like so:

$[(x - \zeta)(x - \zeta^4)][(x - \zeta^2)(x - \zeta^3)]$

Since each quadratic of the factorization above is fixed by $\sigma^2$ (it just swaps roots in each quadratic pair), the coefficients must lie in the fixed field of $\{\text{id}, \sigma^2\}$. In particular:

$(x - \zeta)(x - \zeta^4) = (x - \zeta)(x - \zeta^{-1}) = x^2 - (\zeta + \zeta^{-1})x + 1$

has coefficients in this fixed field. So the fixed field CONTAINS $\Bbb Q(\zeta + \zeta^{-1})$.

Note as well, that complex conjugation restricted to $\Bbb Q(\zeta)$ is an automorphism of $\Bbb Q(\zeta)$ of order 2 that fixes $\Bbb Q$, so $\sigma^2$ IS complex conjugation.

What that tells us, is that $\zeta^4 = \overline{\zeta}$, and thus that $\Bbb Q(\zeta+\zeta^{-1}) \subseteq \Bbb R$.

Since the roots of $x^2 - (\zeta + \zeta^{-1})x + 1 = (x - \zeta)(x - \overline{\zeta})$ are not real, they certainly do not lie in $\Bbb Q(\zeta+\zeta^{-1})$, and thus:

$x^2 - (\zeta + \zeta^{-1})x + 1$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q(\zeta + \zeta^{-1})$, which is presumably what you were looking for.

As promised, we will now show the fixed field of the unique subgroup of the Galois group of order 2 IS $\Bbb Q(\zeta + \zeta^{-1})$ (we already know it contains it).

To this end, some preliminary algebra:

$(\zeta + \zeta^{-1})^2 = \zeta^2 + 2(\zeta\zeta^{-1}) + (\zeta^{-1})^2 = \zeta^2 + 2 + \zeta^{-2} = \zeta^2 + \zeta^3 + 2$.

Now the elements of $\Bbb Q(\zeta)$ are of the form:

$a_0 + a_1\zeta + a_2\zeta^2 + a_3\zeta^3: a_0,a_1,a_2,a_3 \in \Bbb Q$.

If such an element $u$ is fixed by $\sigma^2$ (that is $\sigma^2(u) = u$), then we have:

$a_0 + a_1\zeta + a_2\zeta^2 + a_3\zeta^3 = \sigma^2(a_0 + a_1\zeta + a_2\zeta^2 + a_3\zeta^3)$

$= a_0 + a_1\sigma^2(\zeta) + a_2\sigma^2(\zeta^2) + a_3\sigma^2(\zeta^3)$

$= a_0 + a_1\zeta^4 + a_2\zeta^3 + a_3\zeta^2$.

Recall that $\zeta^4 + \zeta^3 + \zeta^2 + \zeta + 1 = 0$, so:

$\zeta^4 = -\zeta^3 - \zeta^2 - \zeta - 1$, so that:

$a_0 + a_1\zeta^4 + a_2\zeta^3 + a_3\zeta^2 = (a_0 - a_1) - a_1\zeta + (a_3 - a_1)\zeta^2 + (a_2 - a_1)\zeta^3$.

Equating the coefficients (they must be equal, since by the linear independence of $\{1,\zeta,\zeta^2,\zeta^3\}$ over $\Bbb Q$ these coefficients are unique), we have:

$a_0 = a_0 - a_1$
$a_1 = -a_1$
$a_2 = a_3 - a_1$
$a_3 = a_2 - a_1$, so that $a_1 = 0$, and $a_2 = a_3$.

Thus the elements fixed by $\sigma^2$ are of the form:

$a_0 + a_2\zeta^2 + a_2\zeta^3 = a_0 + a_2(\zeta^2 + \zeta^3) = a_0 - 2a_2 + a_2(\zeta^2 + \zeta^3 + 2)$

$= a_0 - 2a_2 + a_2(\zeta + \zeta^{-1})^2 \in \Bbb Q(\zeta + \zeta^{-1})$

and we see the fixed field is contained in $\Bbb Q(\zeta + \zeta^{-1})$, and thus the two are equal.

**************

Perhaps you were only looking for the "grouping" of factors I did earlier-this is rather the scenic route, and there are shorter ways to get from point A to point B, but I believe it helps to see how the information we get from group theory "forces our hand" in discussing the field structure (which would otherwise be "harder to arrive at").
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much. This was helpful!
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top