Probabilities Associated with Sudden Changes in Potential

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
CDL
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Hi, I have a question about calculating probabilities in situations where a particle experiences a sudden change in potential, in the case where both potentials are time independent.

For example, a tritium atom undergoing spontaneous beta decay, and turning into a Helium-3 ion. The orbital electron is initially in the ground state. The main point about this example is that the orbital electron essentially experiences a sudden change in Coulomb potential, with atomic number Z = 1 to Z = 2. Suppose we want to calculate the probability that after this beta decay the electron is left in the ground state of the new potential. In order to do this, we just take the inner product of the wave-function for the ground state state with Z = 1 with the 1s state, Z = 2, and take the modulus squared. There is our probability. Something like $$\mathbb{P}(\text{1s initial to 1s final}) = |\langle \psi_{1sf} | \psi_{1si} \rangle|^2$$ Where ## \psi_{1si}## and ##\psi_{1sf}## are the wave functions of the ground states in the initial and final potentials.

From what I have seen, this is what is generally done in these situations where the potential suddenly changes, but I'm not entirely comfortable with why this is done. Is this just another way of writing $$\mathbb{P}(\text{transition from state a to state b}) = |\langle \psi_{b} | \psi_{a} \rangle|^2$$

Could someone please explain why this is done, and why we can do this even though the potential changes?

Is it the fact that the wave-function doesn't have time to react to such a change in potential, and so the probability is a measure of 'how much of the proposed state b is present in the state a' ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CDL said:
Is it the fact that the wave-function doesn't have time to react to such a change in potential, and so the probability is a measure of 'how much of the proposed state b is present in the state a' ?

Yes, this is the line of argument. Of course, this can't be entirely true for the whole wavefunction, as the change of the potential very near the nucleus is nearly infinite, so even if the decay occurs on a very short timescale somewhere very near the nucleus the "sudden change" approximation breaks down. But this will only lead to minor corrections.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CDL