Probability Greater than 1 in λφ^4 Theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter geoduck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    S-matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the λφ^4 theory, specifically analyzing the 2x2 scattering amplitude, which is defined as iM=-iλ. The probability of two particles in state |i> remaining in the same state after scattering is calculated to be greater than 1, represented by the norm |1+iM|, which equals sqrt[1^2+λ^2]. This apparent violation of unitarity is explained by the fact that perturbative calculations only maintain unitarity up to the order of λ, with the violation occurring at higher orders, specifically O(λ^2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly λφ^4 theory.
  • Familiarity with scattering amplitudes and their calculations.
  • Knowledge of perturbation theory and its implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of unitarity in quantum mechanics and its significance.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of unitarity in quantum field theories.
  • Explore higher-order perturbative calculations in λφ^4 theory.
  • Learn about the physical significance of scattering amplitudes in particle physics.
  • Investigate the role of renormalization in quantum field theories.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, particle physicists, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of scattering processes.

geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
Take a [tex]\lambda \phi^4[/tex] theory. To first order in λ, the 2x2 scattering amplitude is:

iM=-iλ

So the amplitude <f|S|i> is then <f|(1+iM)|i>=<f|i>+iM<f|i>.

Letting f=i, the probability is greater than 1! It is equal to the norm |1+iM| which is sqrt[1^2+λ^2].

How is it that two particles in the state |i> have a probability greater than 1 of being in the same state |i> after scattering?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you do a perturbative calculation to some order in ##\lambda##, you can only expect unitarity to hold up to that order in ##\lambda##. ##\sqrt{1 + \lambda^2} = 1 + O(\lambda^2)##, so the unitarity violation is higher order in ##\lambda## than the accuracy of the first-order perturbative calculation, which is only accurate up to ##O(\lambda)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K