Probability of a Population greater than the one of a sample

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the differences in probability between a population and a sample in statistics, specifically focusing on a scenario where the population probability is given as p = 0.3 with different sample sizes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between population and sample probabilities, questioning why the population probability appears higher despite having the same initial probability value. There is a focus on the implications of sample size and how it affects the observed probabilities.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the differences between sample statistics and population statistics. Some guidance has been provided regarding the variability of sample probabilities compared to the population probability.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of statistical definitions and the implications of sample size on probability outcomes. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clearer communication regarding the initial problem setup.

SV7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on my statistics homework. The professor gave us two problems with the same probability (p), but with different number of trials (n); p= .3 and n= 2 in one and n= 200 in the other one.

He told us one was the actual population and the other one was a sample.

I did both problems and I'm pretty sure I did everything correctly. The only thing I still can't fully understand is why the population probability is higher than one of a sample??

Thank you in advance :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SV7 said:
I'm working on my statistics homework. The professor gave us two problems with the same probability (p), but with different number of trials (n); p= .3 and n= 2 in one and n= 200 in the other one.

He told us one was the actual population and the other one was a sample.

I did both problems and I'm pretty sure I did everything correctly. The only thing I still can't fully understand is why the population probability is higher than one of a sample??
Why do you say that the population probability is larger than that of a sample? Earlier you said that you had two problems with the same probability.
 
Mark44 said:
Why do you say that the population probability is larger than that of a sample? Earlier you said that you had two problems with the same probability.

Right, I guess I didn't make my question clear enough sorry. We had to tell the probability of 1 of the 2 people having a disease and of 100 out of the 200 people. My question was, why is the answer higher for the population than it was for the sample, if they have the same probability and we're trying half of both?
 
There are a couple of things going on here: sample statistic vs. population statistic. For a given population the various statistics (e.g., mean, standard deviation, etc.) have certain values. For a sample taken from that population the same statistics typically have different values.

For example, in the population (size n = 200), 30% have a particular disease (p = .3). If you take a sample of size n = 2, there are various possibilities:
0 people have the disease.
1 person has the disease.
2 people have the disease.
The sample value of p will be 0, .5, or 1, respectively. All of these values are different from the population value of p, which is .3.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K