MHB Probability of AT LEAST 3 6s in 5 Dice Rolls

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the probability of rolling at least three sixes with five six-sided dice, the equation should be set up by adding the probabilities of exactly three, four, and five sixes. The probability of exactly three sixes is calculated using the combination formula, resulting in approximately 0.03215. For exactly four sixes, the probability is about 0.003215, and for five sixes, it is approximately 0.0001286. By summing these probabilities, one can determine the overall probability of rolling at least three sixes. This method is more effective than subtracting from total occurrences.
Peter Mole
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
I've been teaching myself Probability Mathematics, but I'm still struggling.

Please help me understand with an example.
Say I roll five six-sided dice all at once, with die faces numbered 1 through 6.
I want to determine the probability of AT LEAST three 6s occurring. First, is this the best way to set up the equation?

P(at least three 6s) = 1 - P(zero 6s) - P(exactly one 6) - P(exactly two 6s)

Or can the equation be better setup by subtracting AT LEAST occurrences?

I know this much...
P(zero 6s) = 5/6 * 5/6 * 5/6 * 5/6 * 5/6 = 3,125/7,776 = 0.40188
P(all 6s) = 1/6 * 1/6 * 1/6 *1/6 * 1/6 = 1/7,776
P(at least one 6) = 1 - P(zero 6s) = 4,651/7,776

To restate my whole problem, I'm unclear on the best way to calculate for "exactly 2" occurrences. Likewise for "exactly 3" or any other "exact" occurrence more than one but less than equal to the total number of dice thrown.

Thanks for your help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't subtract. I would add. Rolling 5 dice, "at least three sixes" means 3 or 4 or 5. Calculate each of those separatelt then add them. On anyone toss, the probability of a "six" is 1/6, the probability of anything else is 5/6.

a) Exactly 3 sixes. The probability of 3 sixes and 2 non-sixes in that order is (1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)(5/6). Writing "s" for a six, "n" for a non-six, that would be "sssnn". But there are $\frac{5!}{3!2!}= 10$ different orders in which we can write "3 s's and 2 n's and each order has the same probability so there are 10(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)(5/6)= [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]0.0321502[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif] approximately.

b) Exactly 4 sixes.
The probability of 4 sixes and 1 non-six in that order is (1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6). Writing "s" for a six, "n" for a non-six, that would be "ssssn". But there are $\frac{5!}{4!1!}= 5$ different orders in which we can write "3 s's and 2 n's and each order has the same probability so there are 5(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)= [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]0.0032150
[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]
approximately.

c) Exactly 5 sixes. That is, of course, (1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)= 0.0001286, approximately.

Add those.

 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top