High School Understanding Probability of Bias in Coin and Dice Tosses

  • Thread starter Thread starter bsharvy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bias Probability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the probability of bias in coin and dice tosses, emphasizing that the probability of a coin being biased cannot be determined without a prior probability. The participants clarify that the assumption of bias should be evaluated through the lens of Bayesian statistics, rather than frequentist statistics. Key concepts include rejecting the null hypothesis and significance levels such as 0.05, 0.025, and 0.01. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding prior probabilities when assessing the likelihood of bias in coins or dice.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bayesian statistics
  • Familiarity with the concept of null hypothesis
  • Knowledge of significance levels in statistical testing
  • Basic probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Bayesian inference and its applications in hypothesis testing
  • Learn about null hypothesis significance testing (NHST)
  • Explore the concept of prior probabilities in Bayesian analysis
  • Investigate the implications of significance levels in scientific research
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, researchers in scientific fields, and anyone interested in understanding the statistical evaluation of bias in experiments.

bsharvy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Can you find the probability that a coin or die is loaded?
I was thinking that the probability of a set of events not happening is the same as the probability of that the die/coin is biased.

So, if I flip a coin 10 times and get heads every time, the probability the coin is biased is 1- (.5)^7.

Roll a die 5 times, get "4" all times, probability of bias = 1 - (1/6)^5

But that suggests the probability of bias after one coin toss is 50%, which can't be right. I'm also not sure how to calculate when the results are mixed, such as flipping a coin 10 times and getting heads 7 times.

Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question has a subtle, but important, mistake. Whether a coin is biased is not a random variable with a probability. So you should not talk about its probability. The only probability that you can talk about is that of getting a certain result from a fair coin. If that probability is too low, you are justified in rejecting the assumption that the coin is fair. This is called "rejecting the null hypothesis". There are certain standard levels of small probability, called "significance levels", that allow you to reject the null hypothesis. They include 0.05, 0.025, and 0.01. These are the probabilities of rejecting the null hypothesis even though it is true, so smaller is better. For something like the discovery of a new elementary particle in science, the significance level required is extremely demanding. It is "5 sigma", which is a probability of ##3\times 10^{-7}## or about one in 3.5 million.
 
Last edited:
bsharvy said:
TL;DR Summary: Can you find the probability that a coin or die is loaded?

I was thinking that the probability of a set of events not happening is the same as the probability of that the die/coin is biased.

So, if I flip a coin 10 times and get heads every time, the probability the coin is biased is 1- (.5)^7.

Roll a die 5 times, get "4" all times, probability of bias = 1 - (1/6)^5

But that suggests the probability of bias after one coin toss is 50%, which can't be right. I'm also not sure how to calculate when the results are mixed, such as flipping a coin 10 times and getting heads 7 times.

Help!
You cannot compute the probability that a coin is biased without a prior probability of the coin being biased. Consider the two extreme cases:

1) There are no biased coins.

2) All coins are biased.

To take a more realistic example: assume that one coin in a hundred is biased (and to keep things simple comes up heades every times). Out of approximately every 1100 coins we have:

1000 fair coins that give ten heads in a row approximately once;
11 biased coins that come up heads every time.

If we get 10 heads in a row, then the probability is about 11/12 that the coin is biased.

If we assume that one coin in a thousand or one coin in a million is biased, we will get very different answers.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
FactChecker said:
Whether a coin is biased is not a random variable with a probability. So you should not talk about its probability.
It certainly can be considered a random variable with a probability distribution in Bayesian statistics. But in frequentist statistics it would not be a random variable.

PeroK said:
You cannot compute the probability that a coin is biased without a prior probability of the coin being biased.
Yes, I agree, the prior probability is needed.

@bsharvy basically this is an exercise in Bayesian statistics. I have a set of Insights articles on this topic. In particular, the third one may be useful for you since I specifically examine the fair coin question in some depth:

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/how-bayesian-inference-works-in-the-context-of-science/
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
15K