High School Probability of finding an electron

Click For Summary
The probability of finding an electron belonging to the px orbital on the z-axis is indeed zero, as the z-axis has no volume. This aligns with the principle that in a continuous distribution, the probability of a random variable taking on a specific value is zero. The electron wave function is spread over a volume, meaning there is a chance of finding the electron within any finite volume. Consequently, if the volume approaches zero, the probability also approaches zero. Thus, both the z-axis and x-axis have a probability of zero for finding the electron at a specific point.
physicsmaths1613
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Let us assume that we have an electron belonging to the px orbital. In that case what would be the probability of finding it on the z axis? Would it be zero? My teacher says so, but I think that because we can't predict the boundary where there is 100% possibility of finding an electron, we can't find a point where the probability of finding it is 0. Who is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You instructor is correct if I understand your question. The electron wave function is spread over a volume. Any finite volume the electron will have some chance of being found there. [edit: the smaller the volume the smaller the probability] The z-axis has no volume so the probability is zero.
 
Paul Colby said:
You instructor is correct if I understand your question. The electron wave function is spread over a volume. Any finite volume the electron will have some chance of being found there. [edit: the smaller the volume the smaller the probability] The z-axis has no volume so the probability is zero.
Does that mean that the probability of finding the electron on the x-axis is 0 too, as it has no volume like the Z axis?
 
Yes, written out ##P_{\Delta V}=\int\int\int_{\Delta V} \vert \psi(x)\vert^2 d^3x## if ##\Delta V=0## then ##P=0##.
 
This discussion is a special case of an obvious principle. The probability of a random variable, with a continuous distribution, having a specific value, is 0.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K