B Probability of firing exactly one shot in each annular zone

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
TL;DR Summary
Suppose a circular target is divided into three zones bounded by concentric circles of radius 1/3, 1/2, and 1, as illustrated in the following diagram.
If three shots are fired at random at the target, what is the probability that exactly one shot lands in each zone?
1664778873790.png

My attempt to answer this question: With the radii in the ratio ## 1: \frac12: \frac13 ##, the area of the corresponding circles will be in the ratio of ##1: \frac14: \frac19 ##. The areas of the three rings will be in the ratio of ## \frac34 : \frac{5}{36}: \frac19 ##
So, if three shots are fired at random at the target, the probability that exactly one shots lands in each zone is equal to ## \frac34 \times \frac{5}{36} \times \frac19 = \frac{5}{432}## But author said the answer is ##\frac{5}{432}\times 3! = \frac{5}{72}## How is that?

Would any member of physics forum provide me a satisfactory explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WMDhamnekar said:
Summary: Suppose a circular target is divided into three zones bounded by concentric circles of radius 1/3, 1/2, and 1, as illustrated in the following diagram.
If three shots are fired at random at the target, what is the probability that exactly one shot lands in each zone?

View attachment 314939
My attempt to answer this question: With the radii in the ratio ## 1: \frac12: \frac13 ##, the area of the corresponding circles will be in the ratio of ##1: \frac14: \frac19 ##. The areas of the three rings will be in the ratio of ## \frac34 : \frac{5}{36}: \frac19 ##
So, if three shots are fired at random at the target, the probability that exactly one shots lands in each zone is equal to ## \frac34 \times \frac{5}{36} \times \frac19 = \frac{5}{432}## But author said the answer is ##\frac{5}{432}\times 3! = \frac{5}{72}## How is that?

Would any member of physics forum provide me a satisfactory explanation?
You've calculated the probability that the first shot lands in the outer area, the second lands in the middle area and the third lands in the inner area. That is not the only way you can have one in each area.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Dale and WMDhamnekar
PeroK said:
You've calculated the probability that the first shot lands in the outer area, the second lands in the middle area and the third lands in the inner area. That is not the only way you can have one in each area.
Using above comment, there are 6 possible permutations, giving the correct answer. Assuming no misses.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
125
Views
19K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Back
Top