Probability of measuring an eigenstate of the operator L ^ 2

Marioweee
Messages
18
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
psb
Relevant Equations
$L^2Y^{m}_l=\hbar^2l(l+1)Y^{m}_l$
Calculate, with a relevant digit, the probability that the measure of the angular momentum $L ^2$ of a particle whose normalized wave function is
\begin{equation}
\Psi(r,\theta,\varphi)=sin^2(\theta)e^{-i\varphi}f(r)
\end{equation}
is strictly greater than ##12(\hbar)^2##.
------------------------------------------------
My solution:
First of all, if the measure is sitrictly greater than ##12(\hbar)^2## then l has to be greater than 3 because:
\begin{equation}
L^2Y^{m}_l=\hbar^2l(l+1)Y^{m}_l
\end{equation}
Then, to apply the operator ##L^2## I have tried to express the wave function as linear combination of spherical harmonics.
\begin{equation}
sin^2(\theta)e^{-i\varphi}=\sum_{l=0}^{\inf}\sum_{m=-l}^{l}f^{m}_{l}Y^{m}_{l}
\end{equation}
with the coefficients ##f^{m}_{l}##:
\begin{equation}
f^{m}_{l}=\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\varphi\int_{0}^{\pi}d\theta sin^2(\theta)e^{-i\varphi}(Y^{m}_{l})^{*}
\end{equation}

Realizing that the only nonzero integrals are those with the coefficients l=1,3,5,7... and m=-1.

Therefore, it follows that:
\begin{equation}
sin^2(\theta)e^{-i\phi}=\sum_{l=1,3,5,...}^{\inf}f^{-1}_{l}Y^{-1}_{l}
\end{equation}
Next I have calculated with a software the coefficients ##f^{-1}_{l}## and the probability of measuring a value lower ##12\hbar^2## should be:
\begin{equation}
P(L^2<12\hbar^2)=1-|f^{-1}|^2_{1}-|f^{-1}_{3}|^2
\end{equation}
The problem is that the sum of the infinite coefficients f is not 1 (at least that seems to be when adding quite a few terms) so they cannot indicate the probability. How can I normalize the infinite linear combination so that the sum of the terms is 1 and indicates the probability of measuring an eigenstate of ##L^2##. Would there be another method to solve the exercise?
Thank you very much for your attention and help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's an idea for making the calculation more manageable. If you let ##P(l,m)## be the probability of finding ##L = l## and ##L_z = m##, then you have:

##\sum_{l=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-l}^{+l}P(l,m) = 1##

Now, we can break it up into two parts:

##\sum_{l=0}^3 \sum_{m=-l}^{+l}P(l,m) + \sum_{l=4}^\infty \sum_{m=-l}^{+l} P(l,m) = 1##

The second part is what you're being asked to calculate, but you can rewrite it as:

##\sum_{l=4}^\infty \sum_{m=-l}^{+l} P(l,m) = 1 - \sum_{l=0}^3 \sum_{m=-l}^{+l}P(l,m)##

Now, the right-hand side only involves 4 terms.
 
  • Like
Likes Marioweee
Marioweee said:
\begin{equation}
f^{m}_{l}=\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\varphi\int_{0}^{\pi}d\theta sin^2(\theta)e^{-i\varphi}(Y^{m}_{l})^{*}
\end{equation}
If you want ##|f^{m}_{l}|^2## to represent a probability, then you should first normalize the function ##\sin^2\theta e^{-i\varphi}##.

When integrating over ##\varphi## and ##\theta##, ##\int d\varphi \int d \theta## should be ##\int d\varphi \int \sin \theta \, d \theta##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Marioweee
stevendaryl said:
Here's an idea for making the calculation more manageable. If you let ##P(l,m)## be the probability of finding ##L = l## and ##L_z = m##, then you have:

##\sum_{l=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-l}^{+l}P(l,m) = 1##

Now, we can break it up into two parts:

##\sum_{l=0}^3 \sum_{m=-l}^{+l}P(l,m) + \sum_{l=4}^\infty \sum_{m=-l}^{+l} P(l,m) = 1##

The second part is what you're being asked to calculate, but you can rewrite it as:

##\sum_{l=4}^\infty \sum_{m=-l}^{+l} P(l,m) = 1 - \sum_{l=0}^3 \sum_{m=-l}^{+l}P(l,m)##

Now, the right-hand side only involves 4 terms.
This is what I have tried to express with equation 6. Anyways, thank you very much for your attention and for your help.
 
TSny said:
If you want ##|f^{m}_{l}|^2## to represent a probability, then you should first normalize the function ##\sin^2\theta e^{-i\varphi}##.

When integrating over ##\varphi## and ##\theta##, ##\int d\varphi \int d \theta## should be ##\int d\varphi \int \sin \theta \, d \theta##
I had not even thought about it since the statement said that the function was already normalized but this must be the solution. Thank you very much, in a while I will try and if I have any questions I will comment. Again, thank you very much.
 
Marioweee said:
I had not even thought about it since the statement said that the function was already normalized but this must be the solution. Thank you very much, in a while I will try and if I have any questions I will comment. Again, thank you very much.
The wavefunction involves the radial function ##f(r)##. The normalization, therefore, puts a condition on ##f(r)## to balance the angular function you are given.

For example, we can rewrite the normalized wavefunction as:
\begin{equation}
\Psi(r,\theta,\varphi)=N sin^2(\theta)e^{-i\varphi} (\frac 1 N f(r))
\end{equation}

Where ##N## is a normalization constant needed for the spherical harmonic decomposition.
 
I've calculated N which is equal to ##\dfrac{15}{32\pi}##. Therefore, the probability of measuring ##L^2## greater than ##12h\hbar^2## would be:
\begin{equation}
P(L^2>12\hbar^2)=1-\dfrac{15}{32\pi}(|f_{1}^{-1}|^2+||f_{3}^{-1}|^2)
\end{equation}
Sorry for so many obvious questions but I am new to quantum mechanics and I still miss the basics but I want to make sure I do things correctly.
 
Marioweee said:
I've calculated N which is equal to ##\dfrac{15}{32\pi}##. Therefore, the probability of measuring ##L^2## greater than ##12h\hbar^2## would be:
\begin{equation}
P(L^2>12\hbar^2)=1-\dfrac{15}{32\pi}(|f_{1}^{-1}|^2+||f_{3}^{-1}|^2)
\end{equation}
Sorry for so many obvious questions but I am new to quantum mechanics and I still miss the basics but I want to make sure I do things correctly.
Are you sure that's not ##N^2 = \frac{15}{32\pi}##?
 
PeroK said:
Are you sure that's not ##N^2 = \frac{15}{32\pi}##?
Yes, you are right, that's ##N^2##.
 
  • #10
Marioweee said:
Therefore, the probability of measuring ##L^2## greater than ##12h\hbar^2## would be:
\begin{equation}
P(L^2>12\hbar^2)=1-\dfrac{15}{32\pi}(|f_{1}^{-1}|^2+||f_{3}^{-1}|^2)
\end{equation}

That looks right.
 
  • #11
Okey, I finally got the answer. Thanks for everyone's help, for my part I conclude this post.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny and PeroK
Back
Top