MHB Probability of Rolling Sum > 3 with Two Dice

anyalong18
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Two fair dice are rolled. What is the probability of rolling a sum that exceeds 3?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
main-qimg-959c62dd441929b7a0079f1cc2ef185a
 
skeeter said:
main-qimg-959c62dd441929b7a0079f1cc2ef185a
is it 1/36
 
a sum that exceeds 3 is a sum $\ge$ 4
 
When rolling two dice the possible sums are 1+ 1= 2 to 6+ 6= 12. The specific possible outcomes are
1+ 1= 2
1+ 2= 3
1+ 3= 4
1+ 4= 5
1+ 5= 6
1+ 6= 7
2+ 1= 3
2+ 2= 4
2+ 3= 5
2+ 4= 6
2+ 5= 7
2+ 6= 8
3+ 1= 4
3+ 2= 5
3+ 3= 6
3+ 4= 7
3+ 5= 8
3+ 6= 9
4+ 1= 5
4+ 2= 6
4+ 3= 7
4+ 4= 8
4+ 5= 9
4+ 6= 10
5+ 1= 6
5+ 2= 7
5+ 3= 8
5+ 4= 9
5+ 5= 10
5+ 6= 11
6+ 1= 7
6+ 2= 8
6+ 3= 9
6+ 4= 10
6+ 5= 11
6+ 6= 12

A total of 6x6= 36 outcomes, not all different.

Now, how many of those "exceed 3" (i.e. are 4 or higher)? The probability of exceeding 3 is that number divided by 36.
 
You might find it simpler to count the number of rolls that give "2" or "3" and subtract that from 36.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top