MHB Probability of Rolling Sum > 3 with Two Dice

AI Thread Summary
When rolling two fair dice, the total number of possible outcomes is 36. The sums that exceed 3 are 4 through 12. There are 34 outcomes that yield a sum greater than 3, meaning the probability of rolling a sum greater than 3 is 34 out of 36. This simplifies to a probability of 17/18. Thus, the probability of rolling a sum greater than 3 with two dice is 17/18.
anyalong18
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Two fair dice are rolled. What is the probability of rolling a sum that exceeds 3?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
main-qimg-959c62dd441929b7a0079f1cc2ef185a
 
skeeter said:
main-qimg-959c62dd441929b7a0079f1cc2ef185a
is it 1/36
 
a sum that exceeds 3 is a sum $\ge$ 4
 
When rolling two dice the possible sums are 1+ 1= 2 to 6+ 6= 12. The specific possible outcomes are
1+ 1= 2
1+ 2= 3
1+ 3= 4
1+ 4= 5
1+ 5= 6
1+ 6= 7
2+ 1= 3
2+ 2= 4
2+ 3= 5
2+ 4= 6
2+ 5= 7
2+ 6= 8
3+ 1= 4
3+ 2= 5
3+ 3= 6
3+ 4= 7
3+ 5= 8
3+ 6= 9
4+ 1= 5
4+ 2= 6
4+ 3= 7
4+ 4= 8
4+ 5= 9
4+ 6= 10
5+ 1= 6
5+ 2= 7
5+ 3= 8
5+ 4= 9
5+ 5= 10
5+ 6= 11
6+ 1= 7
6+ 2= 8
6+ 3= 9
6+ 4= 10
6+ 5= 11
6+ 6= 12

A total of 6x6= 36 outcomes, not all different.

Now, how many of those "exceed 3" (i.e. are 4 or higher)? The probability of exceeding 3 is that number divided by 36.
 
You might find it simpler to count the number of rolls that give "2" or "3" and subtract that from 36.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top