Is it true that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Pr( ∪_(n from m to k) ((A_n) ∩ ((A_(n+1))^c)) )

= Pr( ∪_(n from m to k) (A_n) ) - Pr( (A_k) ∩ (A_k+1) )

where A_1, A_2, ... is any sequence of sets.

Well, for the (k=m+1) case I am convinced since I can see they are equal after expanding both sides out, so for example I can see that

Pr((A∩(B^c))∪(B∩(C^c))) = Pr(A∪B) - Pr(B∩C)

but I can't manage to do the same for the (k>m) case in general, so overall I'm not convinced.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Probability of unions/intersections

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**