Is it true that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Pr( ∪_(n from m to k) ((A_n) ∩ ((A_(n+1))^c)) )

= Pr( ∪_(n from m to k) (A_n) ) - Pr( (A_k) ∩ (A_k+1) )

where A_1, A_2, ... is any sequence of sets.

Well, for the (k=m+1) case I am convinced since I can see they are equal after expanding both sides out, so for example I can see that

Pr((A∩(B^c))∪(B∩(C^c))) = Pr(A∪B) - Pr(B∩C)

but I can't manage to do the same for the (k>m) case in general, so overall I'm not convinced.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Probability of unions/intersections

Loading...

Similar Threads for Probability unions intersections | Date |
---|---|

A How to calculate probability of error in an AWGN channel? | Today at 12:06 AM |

A Sum of independent random variables and Normalization | Apr 19, 2018 |

[Advanced] Probability of Union[n-elements] | Oct 6, 2011 |

Probability - Breaking up an event into unions of complements | Mar 15, 2010 |

Question about probability of union | Jan 9, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**