MHB Probability Question about Affording Loaves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Byeongok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Byeongok
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A bakery sells 3 types of bread: raisin at 2 dollars a loaf, sourdough at 3 dollars a loaf and white at 1.5 dollars a loaf. There are twice the number of white loaves than sourdough and equal numbers of sourdough and raisin. Lillian is in a hurry and randomly selects 2 loaves and takes them to the counter to pay.
Lillian only has 4 dollars in her purse.

Show suitable workings to find the probability that Lillian will be able to afford her 2 chosen loaves.

Lillian Purse = 4 dollars
2 Raisin = 4 dollars
2 Sourdough = 6 dollars
2 White bread = 3 dollars

1 Raisin = 1 Sourdough = 2 White
(She can’t afford 2 of sourdough)

Pr (Can’t afford 2 Loaves) = 1/4
Pr (Can afford 2 Loaves) = 3/4 b. State any assumptions you have made.

She has ¾ chance that she can afford 2 loaves of bread, and ¼ chance she can’t afford 2 loaves of bread.

EDIT: I DONT KNOW WHY THE FONTS ARE WEIRD FOR THE FIRST PART D:
EDIT2: FIXED
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Year10Student,

Welcome to MHB! :)

If we assume that she must pick two of the same kind, then you are correct.

Here's a way to do it through probability properties. We know that $$P(W)+P(S)+P(R)=1$$ because the sum of all possible probabilities must equal 1. We also know that $P(S)=P(R)$ as well as $2P(S)=P(W)$. Combining this into the first equation we get that $2P(S)+P(S)+P(S)=1$, which means $$4P(S)=1 \implies P(S)=\frac{1}{4}, P(R)=\frac{1}{4}, P(W)=\frac{1}{2}$$

She can afford two raisins or two whites, so if we add $P(R)+P(W)$ we indeed get $$\frac{3}{4}$$ and get $$\frac{1}{4}$$ for the sourdough, which she can't afford.

To do the problem this way we have assumed two things:

1) She will pick 2 loaves of the same kind of bread.
2) Each loaf is equally likely.
 
Jameson said:
Hi Year10Student,

Welcome to MHB! :)

If we assume that she must pick two of the same kind, then you are correct.

Here's a way to do it through probability properties. We know that $$P(W)+P(S)+P(R)=1$$ because the sum of all possible probabilities must equal 1. We also know that $P(S)=P(R)$ as well as $2P(S)=P(W)$. Combining this into the first equation we get that $2P(S)+P(S)+P(S)=1$, which means $$4P(S)=1 \implies P(S)=\frac{1}{4}, P(R)=\frac{1}{4}, P(W)=\frac{1}{2}$$

She can afford two raisins or two whites, so if we add $P(R)+P(W)$ we indeed get $$\frac{3}{4}$$ and get $$\frac{1}{4}$$ for the sourdough, which she can't afford.

To do the problem this way we have assumed two things:

1) She will pick 2 loaves of the same kind of bread.
2) Each loaf is equally likely.

Thanks for the reply!

but would it be possible to find out the probability of her being able to afford 2 loaves that aren't the same type?

For example, 1 sourdough and 1 white bread or 1 raisin and 1 white.

Its confusing!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top