MHB Probability that wrong candidate was selected

  • Thread starter Thread starter eddybob123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability that the wrong candidate was selected in an election scenario involving two candidates, A and B, with respective votes m and n, and a probability p of incorrectly counted votes. Participants suggest using a binomial distribution to model the problem, with one contributor proposing an approximation using a normal distribution for larger sample sizes. The conversation highlights the need for assumptions about the number of voters and the probability of accurate votes for the approximation to hold. A formula involving z-scores is introduced to find the probability that candidate A won despite potentially losing. The importance of large sample sizes for accurate approximation is emphasized throughout the discussion.
eddybob123
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. It won't be that common to see me actually post my own thread, but I am having a little trouble with this problem. My friend was accepted into the University of Berkeley, and this was one of the questions on his first exam. Apparently, no one in his class got this one right, and I told him I would try to get the answer. Here is the problem:

There are two candidates: A and B. Candidate A got m votes and B got n votes. If the probability that a vote was incorrectly counted is p, then what is the probability that the wrong candidate was selected (in terms of m, n, and p).

(Starting to copy agent here)

(Bandit)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't have time to solve this right now but I would guess that it would involve the binomial distribution, as in "probability of at least $m - n$ incorrect votes" or something close to that (in order to push the wrong candidate ahead of the legitimate one). What do you think?
 
eddybob123 said:
Hi everyone. It won't be that common to see me actually post my own thread, but I am having a little trouble with this problem. My friend was accepted into the University of Berkeley, and this was one of the questions on his first exam. Apparently, no one in his class got this one right, and I told him I would try to get the answer. Here is the problem:

There are two candidates: A and B. Candidate A got m votes and B got n votes. If the probability that a vote was incorrectly counted is p, then what is the probability that the wrong candidate was selected (in terms of m, n, and p).

(Starting to copy agent here)

Hi eddybob!

To be honest, this doesn't fit in the regular statistical testing theory that I'm used to.
But with a bit of creativity we can get an answer.
As I see it, your problem statement calls for a couple of approximations and assumptions.

I would assume the number of voters is big enough and the probability on a proper vote p is big enough that we can approximate the number of votes by a normal distribution.

Suppose A won the vote, that is, m > n.
And suppose this is representative for the real situation, what is then the probability of a vote in which A would have lost?
Due to symmetry, this should give approximately the same probability as when A should have lost, but scored m > n votes anyway.

We can approximate the corresponding binomial distribution with a normal distribution
with mean $m$ and variance $\sigma^2 = (m+n)p(1-p)$.
See wiki.

Now we're looking for the probability that the number of votes is less than half.
The corresponding z value is:
$$z = \frac {\bar x-\mu}{\sigma} = \frac {(m+n)/2 - m}{\sqrt{(m+n)p(1-p)}}$$
The desired probability is P(Z < z).
That is, look up the z-value in a z-table and find the corresponding cumulative probability, which will be approximately the probability that A won while he should have lost.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot! However I think I have some problems with your response (or it just might be me being really naive again (Tongueout).

1. This only happens when m and n are large enough
2. This is an approximation

Can you please justify these?

(Bandit)
 
A binomial distribution with mean \mu and standard distribution \sigma can be approximated with a normal distribution with the same mean and normal distribution. The larger "n" is in the binomial distribution, the better the approximation is. And, of course, it is precisely in the case of large "n" that it is much easier to evaluate the normal distribution than the binomial distribution.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top