Problem about Force, Work, and Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving MJ's fall from a height, focusing on the relationship between force, work, and energy. The initial conditions include heights and forces measured by a scale at different points during the fall. The equations used to solve for the height at h3 are questioned, particularly regarding the interpretation of forces and the scale's readings. Clarification is sought on whether the scale measures normal force and how the heights are defined in relation to MJ's posture. The conversation highlights the complexities in applying energy conservation principles in this context.
mrcat100
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



MJ is falling from the highest point in his jump.
h1(the highest point) = 2m, and the scale reads 0N,
h2 = 1m, and the scale reads 2500N,
and h3=?m, and the scale reads 800N.
MJ is at rest at h3

Homework Equations



E1+W of point2-3= E3

The Attempt at a Solution



mgh1+FN(h2-h3)+Fg(h2-h3)= mgh3, because there is no KE1 or KE3,
80(10)(2)+2500-2500h3-800+800h3= 800h3,
3300= 2500h3, h3 = 1.32m (obviously incorrect as h3 is higher than h2)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What 'scale' is this - what is it measuring? Should the 800m be 800N?
 
Sorry, the question is talking about a scale as in a bathroom scale, which measures FN in Newtons
 
Then my next question is how exactly the heights are defined. At h2, he must be in contact with the scales, so the height is not being measured from scales to feet. If it's from scales to anything higher than the ankle it will depend on posture - maybe he's crouching at h2, and the heights are measured to the head. But a reasonable guess is that he's upright in each case and the heights are measured to c of g.
I don't see how you can write the equations you have in your attempt. They imply e.g. that the scales supplied an upward force of 2500N for the entire distance as he descended from h3 to h2.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top