Problem about non-inertial reference frame

  • Thread starter Thread starter MatinSAR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frame Reference
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on analyzing motion in non-inertial reference frames, specifically comparing the accelerations experienced by a point mass as observed from an inertial frame (O) and a non-inertial frame (O'). The participants utilize concepts from "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Stephen Thornton, addressing fictitious forces and angular velocities. Key conclusions include the necessity of comparing accelerations in both frames and the impossibility of simply adding rotations about different centers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the non-inertial frame's motion and the implications of fictitious forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-inertial reference frames
  • Familiarity with fictitious forces in classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its implications
  • Ability to differentiate vector expressions for motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of fictitious forces in non-inertial frames
  • Learn how to derive accelerations in both inertial and non-inertial frames
  • Explore angular momentum conservation in rotating systems
  • Investigate the mathematical representation of motion in non-inertial frames
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to non-inertial reference frames and fictitious forces.

MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Consider two circles(in a plane) rotating with a constant angular velocity, ω, relative to an inertial reference frame. The center of one circle is fixed at the origin of this reference frame, while the center of the second circle is located on the circumference of the first circle. If there is a point mass located on the second circle, what would be the fictitious force acting on it? The position vector of the point mass is ##\vec R(t)## in C1 circle.
Relevant Equations
Newton's 2nd law in non-inertial reference frame.
Picture of the problem:
1716264440610.png


I wanted to use this formula: (From Classical dynamics of particles and systems Book by Stephen Thornton)
1716264286607.png

1716265465008.png

O is inertial observer. O' is non-inertial observer.
I think ##F## and ##\ddot R## and ##\dot \omega## are ##0##. According to O' the point mass has velocity of ##v_r## so it's not ##0##. I believe I just need to determine the values of ##w \times r## and ##\omega \times v_r##.

However, I’m uncertain about how to proceed. I would appreciate any assistance you could provide.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your choice of non-inertial frame is not entirely clear. Is it:
  • origin O' orbits O but the axes are in fixed directions,
  • origin O' orbits O and axes rotate anticlockwise at rate ##\omega##, or
  • origin remains at O but axes rotate anticlockwise at rate ##\omega##
?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
haruspex said:
  • origin O' orbits O but the axes are in fixed directions
This is what I meant.
 
I would answer the question by comparing the accelerations in the two reference frames. The fictitious force would be held responsible for the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
haruspex said:
The fictitious force would be held responsible for the difference.
Very meaningful. I didn't look at it this way. I will try to solve again.
 
haruspex said:
I would answer the question by comparing the accelerations in the two reference frames. The fictitious force would be held responsible for the difference.
Can I say that the point mass rotates with angular velocity of ##\vec \omega## compare to O' and ##2 \vec \omega## compare to O?
1716480813056.png
 
MatinSAR said:
Can I say that the point mass rotates with angular velocity of ##\vec \omega## compare to O' and ##2 \vec \omega## compare to O?
View attachment 345791
No, you can’t add rotations about different centres. The motion of the point about O varies over time. If the radii are ##r_1, r_2## then the motion varies between
- a tangential speed of ##\omega r_2+\omega(r_1+r_2)## at distance ##r_1+r_2##, implying an angular rotation of ##\omega \frac{ r_1+2r_2}{r_1+r_2}## about O, and
- a tangential speed of ##-\omega r_2+\omega(r_1-r_2)## at distance ##r_1-r_2##, implying an angular rotation of ##\omega \frac{ r_1-2r_2}{r_1-r_2}## about O.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
@haruspex I'm going to solve this question using TA's help. I will share the results. Thank you for your help and time.
 
MatinSAR said:
@haruspex I'm going to solve this question using TA's help. I will share the results. Thank you for your help and time.
Ok, but if you write down the vector expression for the position of the mass at time t you can differentiate to find the acceleration. You can do that in both the ground frame and the accelerating frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K