Problem about non-inertial reference frame

  • Thread starter Thread starter MatinSAR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frame Reference
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to non-inertial reference frames in classical dynamics, specifically involving the analysis of forces and accelerations from different observational perspectives. The original poster is trying to understand the implications of using a non-inertial frame and how to apply relevant formulas to determine the motion of a point mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the non-inertial frame and its effects on the observed motion of the point mass. There are discussions about comparing accelerations in different frames and the role of fictitious forces. Questions arise regarding the validity of adding angular velocities from different centers of rotation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications. Some have suggested methods for comparing accelerations, while others are questioning the assumptions made about the reference frames. There is no explicit consensus yet, but guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation of position vectors to find acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of non-inertial frames and the associated fictitious forces. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the setup and the implications of their chosen frame, indicating a need for further exploration of the problem's parameters.

MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Consider two circles(in a plane) rotating with a constant angular velocity, ω, relative to an inertial reference frame. The center of one circle is fixed at the origin of this reference frame, while the center of the second circle is located on the circumference of the first circle. If there is a point mass located on the second circle, what would be the fictitious force acting on it? The position vector of the point mass is ##\vec R(t)## in C1 circle.
Relevant Equations
Newton's 2nd law in non-inertial reference frame.
Picture of the problem:
1716264440610.png


I wanted to use this formula: (From Classical dynamics of particles and systems Book by Stephen Thornton)
1716264286607.png

1716265465008.png

O is inertial observer. O' is non-inertial observer.
I think ##F## and ##\ddot R## and ##\dot \omega## are ##0##. According to O' the point mass has velocity of ##v_r## so it's not ##0##. I believe I just need to determine the values of ##w \times r## and ##\omega \times v_r##.

However, I’m uncertain about how to proceed. I would appreciate any assistance you could provide.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your choice of non-inertial frame is not entirely clear. Is it:
  • origin O' orbits O but the axes are in fixed directions,
  • origin O' orbits O and axes rotate anticlockwise at rate ##\omega##, or
  • origin remains at O but axes rotate anticlockwise at rate ##\omega##
?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
haruspex said:
  • origin O' orbits O but the axes are in fixed directions
This is what I meant.
 
I would answer the question by comparing the accelerations in the two reference frames. The fictitious force would be held responsible for the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
haruspex said:
The fictitious force would be held responsible for the difference.
Very meaningful. I didn't look at it this way. I will try to solve again.
 
haruspex said:
I would answer the question by comparing the accelerations in the two reference frames. The fictitious force would be held responsible for the difference.
Can I say that the point mass rotates with angular velocity of ##\vec \omega## compare to O' and ##2 \vec \omega## compare to O?
1716480813056.png
 
MatinSAR said:
Can I say that the point mass rotates with angular velocity of ##\vec \omega## compare to O' and ##2 \vec \omega## compare to O?
View attachment 345791
No, you can’t add rotations about different centres. The motion of the point about O varies over time. If the radii are ##r_1, r_2## then the motion varies between
- a tangential speed of ##\omega r_2+\omega(r_1+r_2)## at distance ##r_1+r_2##, implying an angular rotation of ##\omega \frac{ r_1+2r_2}{r_1+r_2}## about O, and
- a tangential speed of ##-\omega r_2+\omega(r_1-r_2)## at distance ##r_1-r_2##, implying an angular rotation of ##\omega \frac{ r_1-2r_2}{r_1-r_2}## about O.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
@haruspex I'm going to solve this question using TA's help. I will share the results. Thank you for your help and time.
 
MatinSAR said:
@haruspex I'm going to solve this question using TA's help. I will share the results. Thank you for your help and time.
Ok, but if you write down the vector expression for the position of the mass at time t you can differentiate to find the acceleration. You can do that in both the ground frame and the accelerating frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K