MHB Problem (c) for Discrete Value Ring

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that an element x is a unit of the ring R if and only if the discrete valuation ν(x) equals zero. It begins with the assumption that if x is a unit of R, then both ν(x) and ν(x^{-1}) must be non-negative, leading to the conclusion that ν(x) must be zero. Conversely, if ν(x) equals zero, the relationship between ν(x) and ν(x^{-1}) implies that ν(x^{-1}) is also zero, confirming that x^{-1} is in R. The proof effectively demonstrates the equivalence between being a unit in R and having a discrete valuation of zero. The discussion encapsulates key aspects of discrete valuation theory as applied to the ring R.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Problem (c) for Discrete Value Ring for a unit

I am stuck in the middle of a proof. Here is the background information from Dummit and Foote Abstract Algebra 2nd ed.:

Let $K$ be a field. A discrete valuation on $K$ on a function $\nu$: $K^{\times} \to \Bbb{Z}$ satisfying
  1. $\nu(a\cdot b)=\nu(a)+\nu(b)$ [i.e. $\nu$ is a homomorphism from the multiplication group of nonzero elements of $K$ to $\Bbb{Z}$]
  2. $\nu$ is surjective, and
  3. $\nu(x+y)\ge \min{[\nu(x),\nu(y)]}$, for all $x,y\in K^{\times}$ with $x+y\ne 0$
The set $R=\left\{x\in K^{\times}| \nu(x)\ge 0\right\} \cup \left\{0\right\}$.
From part b.) Prove that nonzero element $x\in K$ either $x$ or $x^{-1}$ is in $R$.
Proof: Suppose $x\in K^{\times}$. Assume $x\notin R$. Then $\nu(x)<0$, we have
\begin{align*}
&0=\nu(1)\\
&=\nu(xx^{-1})\\
&=\nu(x)+\nu(x^{-1})
\end{align*}
the last line implies $\nu(x^{-1})>0$. Therefore, $x^{-1} \in R$. QED

Here is the question: Prove that an element $x$ is a unit of $R$ if and only if $\nu(x)=0$.

Proof: Suppose $x$ is a unit of $R$. By part (b), $\nu(x)>0$...

Thanks
CBarker1
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If $x$ is a unit of $R$, then $\nu(x),\, \nu(x^{-1}) \ge 0$; since $\nu(x) + \nu(x^{-1}) = 0$ one deduces $\nu(x) = 0$. Conversely, if $\nu(x) = 0$, then by the equation $\nu(x) + \nu(x^{-1}) = 0$ it follows that $\nu(x^{-1}) = 0$. Thus $x^{-1}\in R$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K