Problem integrating complex function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 1K views
Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hello, I have been tasked with the next problem, I have to prove that the next two integrals are complex numbers; but I have no idea of how to attack this problem.

Homework Equations


∫dx f*(x) x (-ih) (∂/∂x) f(x) integrating between -∞ and ∞
∫dx f*(x) (-ih) (∂/∂x) (x f(x)) integrating between -∞ and ∞
Where h is a constant, i = √-1 and f* the complex conjugate of the function f

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, the only thing I can think of for solving is a direct integration by parts, using u =f* x and dv= (∂/∂x) f(x) dx for the first integral, with du=f* and v= ∫(∂/∂x) f(x)dx=f(x). But then, I find that
-ih∫u dv= uv -∫v du = -ih( [f f* x]-∞∞+∫f f*dx).
f f*=1, so I find myself with -ih[(∞) (∞-∞)]

All help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't have ##f^*(x)f(x)=1## (where did the x dependence go?) instead, the normalization condition is that ##\int_{-\infty}^\infty f^*(x) f(x) dx = 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frank Einstein
That was a bad mistake I made; even worse for the fact that f is actually a density of probability. Thanks for pointing this error.
Then I get rid of the ∞-∞, but I still have [f f* x]-∞ , which result in a complex but infinite result
 
Frank Einstein said:
That was a bad mistake I made; even worse for the fact that f is actually a density of probability. Thanks for pointing this error.
Then I get rid of the ∞-∞, but I still have [f f* x]-∞ , which result in a complex but infinite result

Why is it infinite? What conditions must ##f(x)## fulfill at the boundaries if we are to be able to normalize them? Why do you think ##f^*(x)f(x)## will diverge at both limits?
 
Frank Einstein said:
That was a bad mistake I made; even worse for the fact that f is actually a density of probability. Thanks for pointing this error.
Then I get rid of the ∞-∞, but I still have [f f* x]-∞ , which result in a complex but infinite result

No: f is NOT a probability density. In general, f has complex values, so cannot possibly be a probability density. However, ##|f|^2 = f^*f## is a probability density.

Also, you did not perform integration by parts correctly. You wrote
[tex]u = f^*(x) x, \;\; dv = (\partial/\partial x) f(x) \, dx \\<br /> \Longrightarrow du = f^* \; \text{ and }\; v = f.[/tex]
The ##v = f## part is OK, but ##du = f^*## is wrong, and does not even make sense, because a ##dx## is missing. Anyway, you need to use the product rule, which you have not done, so it would be wrong even if you supplied the missing ##dx##.
 
You are right. Posting at late night is a bad idea.
Today I have remade my calculations and I think I have arrived to coherent results.
If I make the integration by parts with u = x f* and dv= (∂/∂x)(f(x)) then du = (f* + x (∂f*/∂x)) dx
Taking into account that [f f* x]-∞ is 0 because f goes way faster to 0 than x to ∞ and that ∫f f* dx is 1 I find that the original inegral is it's own complex conjugate plus -ih, what means that the operator is not hermitian and therefore, the solution is not real.

I will use the same procedure for the second integral.