if subspace A is invariant with respect to a linear operator, is it true that A is invariant with respect to the inverse operator? if not I think threre is a mistake in Wigners paper in "B. Some immediate simplifications" page 13(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Problem understanding Wigner's 1939 paper

Loading...

Similar Threads - Problem understanding Wigner's | Date |
---|---|

Problem understanding Wigner's classification | May 10, 2013 |

Problem understanding Green's function equality in Messiah QM II | Sep 28, 2012 |

Problem understanding Sakurai | Feb 14, 2011 |

Pencil tipping problem - trying to understand uncertainty | Oct 26, 2009 |

Problem understanding a statement in Bose Statistics | Aug 15, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**