MHB Problem with cross multiplication

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physiology problem involving the calculation of hemoglobin concentration based on oxygen carrying capacity. The key figures are 1.34 mL of O2 per gram of hemoglobin and 30 mL of O2 per 100 mL of blood. The correct answer is approximately 22.4 g Hb per 100 mL blood, derived from the ratio of 30 to 1.34. Participants express confusion over the professor's explanation of cross multiplication and seek a clearer, more efficient method to set up the problem. The conversation highlights the challenge of understanding ratio setups and the desire for a straightforward approach to arrive at the solution quickly.
Trinley
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have been poring over this problem for days, and I would really appreciate some help. I'm not sure if it's an algebra problem exactly. It's from my physiology class. The professor said it's simple cross multiplication, and I asked him to explain it again, but I didn't understand his explanation. Here's the problem:

The oxygen carrying capacity of hemoglobin is about 1.34 mL of O2 per gram of hemoglobin (Hb).
Imagine a person with 30 mL O2 per 100 mL of blood.
What would his Hb concentration be?


So I have these two figures:

1.34 mL O2 / 1 g Hb
and
30 mL O2/100 mL blood.

I know the answer is about 22.4 g Hb / 100 mL blood. I know 30/1.34 = 22.4, but I would like to really understand how the problem is set up so that it makes sense to me.

Can anyone help? Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Trinley said:
Hello, I have been poring over this problem for days, and I would really appreciate some help. I'm not sure if it's an algebra problem exactly. It's from my physiology class. The professor said it's simple cross multiplication, and I asked him to explain it again, but I didn't understand his explanation. Here's the problem:

The oxygen carrying capacity of hemoglobin is about 1.34 mL of O2 per gram of hemoglobin (Hb).
Imagine a person with 30 mL O2 per 100 mL of blood.
What would his Hb concentration be?


So I have these two figures:

1.34 mL O2 / 1 g Hb
and
30 mL O2/100 mL blood.

I know the answer is about 22.4 g Hb / 100 mL blood. I know 30/1.34 = 22.4, but I would like to really understand how the problem is set up so that it makes sense to me.

Can anyone help? Thank you.

Set up ratios..

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} O_2 &: \textrm{ Hb } \\ 1.34 &: 1 \\ 1 &: \frac{1}{1.34} \\ 1 &: \frac{100}{134} \\ 1 &: \frac{50}{67} \\ \\ O_2 &: \textrm{ Blood } \\ 30 &: 100 \\ 1 &: \frac{100}{30} \\ 1 &: \frac{10}{3} \\ \\ \textrm{Hb } &: \textrm{ Blood } \\ \frac{50}{67} &: \frac{10}{3} \\ \frac{3}{10} \cdot \frac{50}{67} &: 1 \\ \frac{15}{67} &: 1 \end{align*}$

So the concentration is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{15}{67} \end{align*}$ mL of Hb to every mL of blood.
 
That does give the right answer. The professor showed this question in class and asked us calculate it without explaining how. Some people pulled out their phones and gave the answer about 20 seconds. I don't see how they were able to do that. It seems like this way of setting up ratios would take longer and would not be something you can plug into the calculator for a quick answer. Clearly they knew to divide 30 by 1.34, but I don't know how.

The professor showed me that I would just have to set up a simple cross multiplication, but he spoke very quickly and I couldn't follow. Is there a way to set this up as cross multiplication with a minimum of steps?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top