How to Calculate the Limit of Fraction Involving Four Vectors with q --> 0

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter parton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Four vectors Vectors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the limit of a fraction involving two four-vectors, p and q, as q approaches zero. Participants explore different approaches to simplify or rewrite the expression in this limit, considering the implications of the four-vector nature of p and q.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest substituting q with a specific form, such as q = (a,0,0,0), to facilitate the limit calculation as a approaches zero.
  • One participant proposes that the limit may yield a result of m²/(1 ± v) under certain conditions, but notes that the result could vary depending on the path taken as q approaches zero.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for a general solution that compares -pq with the square root term as q approaches zero, questioning whether the ratio approaches a constant and if that constant is path-dependent.
  • There is a suggestion that expanding the expression or using differentials might lead to a clearer understanding of the limit.
  • Concerns are raised about the sign under the square root, with one participant noting that p² should be greater than or equal to p₀², indicating potential confusion or error in the formulation.
  • A later reply reassures that the relationship between p² and p₀² is acceptable, clarifying that p² corresponds to the mass squared.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches and hypotheses regarding the limit calculation, with no consensus reached on a definitive method or result. Multiple competing views remain on how to handle the limit and the implications of different paths taken by q.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the limit's behavior may depend on the chosen path for q approaching zero, and there are unresolved questions regarding the mathematical steps and assumptions involved in the simplifications.

parton
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

\dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}}.

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
parton said:
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

\dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}}.

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?

Hi parton! :smile:

If we're letting q --> 0, then we may as well put q = (a,0,0,0) and let a --> 0.

Then it's -ap0p2/(-ap0 ± √(a2p02 - a2p2)), = -p0p2/(-p0 ± √(p02 - p2)),

which I think is m2/(1 ± v).

But I expect the result is different if q --> 0 along some other path.
 
parton said:
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

\dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}}.

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?

I would like to see a general solution to this as well. I poked at it but nothing immediately jumped out at me. The general solution must determine how -pq compares to \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} as q-->0. It's not obvious to me that the latter approaches zero any order "faster" so the ratio \dfrac{- (pq) }{ \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} must approach some constant, but does that constant depend on q's path?

I'm guessing there is either some nice identity that you can use if you expand it all out OR you may have to use some differentials to eventually end up with A p^{2} where A is some constant.

Although, if the answer really is path independent, then choosing your favorite path might be the way to go like tiny-tim suggested!
 
parton said:
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

\dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}}.

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?

I think you can do this without loss of generality by choosing a coordinate system where q = (a,0,0,0), like tiny-tim suggested. Then (pq)^2 = (p_0a)^2, and p^2 q^2 = p^2 a^2, so then you have

\frac{ -p_0 a p^2}{-p_0a \pm \sqrt{a^2(p_0^2 - p^2)}}

The a's can now be canceled out to give

\frac{ -p_0 p^2}{-p_0 \pm \sqrt{p_0^2 - p^2}}

In another coordinate system, you would interpret p_0 as the component of p that points in the direction of q. I'm a bit surprised at the sign under the square root, since you should have p^2 \ge p_0^2, so maybe I've screwed something up; it's been a whiel since I worked with 4-vectors.
 
kanato said:
...I'm a bit surprised at the sign under the square root, since you should have p^2 \ge p_0^2, so maybe I've screwed something up; it's been a whiel since I worked with 4-vectors.

Everything is OK: p2=m2 but p02>m2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K