Problem with KE and work equation (perfect rocket in space example)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of a rocket using the Tsiolkovsky Δv equation and confirming it with the total work equation. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics and rocket propulsion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of formulas for velocity and force, questioning the assumptions made regarding momentum change and the treatment of mass flow. There are concerns about the definitions of variables and the implications of treating the rocket and its fuel as a single system.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's approach, identifying potential flaws in the reasoning and suggesting areas for clarification. There is recognition of the need to consider the contributions of both thrust and mass flow in the momentum calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express frustration with the format of the original post, noting the reliance on a PDF attachment for critical information. There are also mentions of external resources that may provide additional insights into the problem being discussed.

Jrs580
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
This isn't a formal HW, but here's the problem basically: Calculate the kinetic energy of a rocket after time=t, based off the Tsiolkovsky Δv equation, then confirm it with the total work equation.
Relevant Equations
Δv=v_e ln (m/m_r), 1/2 mv^2, W=Int(F(t).v(t))dt, p=mv, F=dp/dt
Can someone help me by taking a look at the attachment and figuring out where I am making a bad assumption? It's driving me nuts.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Jrs580 said:
Homework Statement: This isn't a formal HW, but here's the problem basically: Calculate the kinetic energy of a rocket after time=t, based off the Tsiolkovsky Δv equation, then confirm it with the total work equation.
Relevant Equations: Δv=v_e ln (m/m_r), 1/2 mv^2, W=Int(F(t).v(t))dt, p=mv, F=dp/dt

Can someone help me by taking a look at the attachment and figuring out where I am making a bad assumption? It's driving me nuts.
I dislike having to open PDF files in order to see the contents of a posting. The PDF has five pages, including a number of typeset equations. Not even a summary is presented here.

Let me go over it in outline.

You begin by defining variables. ##m_i## (initial mass), ##R## (mass flow rate), ##u## (exhaust velocity), ##t## (elapsed time), ##m(t)## (mass as of time ##t##), ##v(t)## (velocity as of time ##t##), ##f(t)## (force on vehicle at time ##t##) and ##K(t)## (kinetic energy of vehicle at time ##t##)

You present the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation and use it to get an expression for ##v(t)## as ##u \ln ( \frac{m_i}{m_i - Rt})##

You proceed to try to derive a formula for ##f(t)## by considering the momentum change of the vehicle. This approach seems flawed.

There are two contributions to the momentum change of the vehicle. One contribution is the thrust from the rocket motor. The other contribution is the mass flow as fuel is pumped (at negligible relative velocity) into the rocket motor and out of the system of interest.

I am going to stop here at the first discovered error.

One more thing. I applaud the organization, style and clarity of your work. You make it clear what you are doing and why. This is extremely valuable assistance in the troubleshooting process.
 
A problem is what you are doing seems to be with the derivative ##\frac{dp}{dt}##. The external force acts on the rocket, the fuel, and the ejecta. Just looking at the rocket velocity doesn't account for enough momentum. Several ways of doing the accounting are developed in:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-develop-the-rocket-equation.961707/post-6895695

Or the entire thread in general.

Also see the recent insight:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/how-to-apply-newtons-second-law-to-variable-mass-systems/
 
Last edited:
jbriggs444 said:
You proceed to try to derive a formula for ##f(t)## by considering the momentum change of the vehicle. This approach seems flawed.
I agree with this statement. You call ##f(t)## the "external force". What is the system to which this force is external? Specifically, does it include the fuel which at one moment is part of ##m(t)## and the next moment it is not? That issue is clarified in the insight article that @erobz recommended.

Also, it will be prudent to assume that the empty rocket has some mass, to avoid logarithmic singularities when the fuel runs out at which point the acceleration becomes zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K