Problem with KE and work equation (perfect rocket in space example)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the kinetic energy of a rocket using the Tsiolkovsky Δv equation and the total work equation. Key equations include Δv = v_e ln(m/m_r) and W = ∫(F(t)·v(t))dt. The main issue identified is a flawed approach in deriving the force f(t) due to an incomplete consideration of momentum changes, particularly regarding the mass flow of fuel. The conversation highlights the importance of accounting for both thrust and mass flow in momentum calculations, as well as the necessity of including the rocket's empty mass to avoid singularities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy calculations (1/2 mv^2)
  • Knowledge of momentum conservation principles
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals and derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation in detail
  • Learn about variable mass systems and their implications in rocket dynamics
  • Explore Newton's second law applications in systems with changing mass
  • Review the integration of force over time to calculate work done
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in rocket propulsion analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the dynamics of variable mass systems.

Jrs580
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
This isn't a formal HW, but here's the problem basically: Calculate the kinetic energy of a rocket after time=t, based off the Tsiolkovsky Δv equation, then confirm it with the total work equation.
Relevant Equations
Δv=v_e ln (m/m_r), 1/2 mv^2, W=Int(F(t).v(t))dt, p=mv, F=dp/dt
Can someone help me by taking a look at the attachment and figuring out where I am making a bad assumption? It's driving me nuts.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Jrs580 said:
Homework Statement: This isn't a formal HW, but here's the problem basically: Calculate the kinetic energy of a rocket after time=t, based off the Tsiolkovsky Δv equation, then confirm it with the total work equation.
Relevant Equations: Δv=v_e ln (m/m_r), 1/2 mv^2, W=Int(F(t).v(t))dt, p=mv, F=dp/dt

Can someone help me by taking a look at the attachment and figuring out where I am making a bad assumption? It's driving me nuts.
I dislike having to open PDF files in order to see the contents of a posting. The PDF has five pages, including a number of typeset equations. Not even a summary is presented here.

Let me go over it in outline.

You begin by defining variables. ##m_i## (initial mass), ##R## (mass flow rate), ##u## (exhaust velocity), ##t## (elapsed time), ##m(t)## (mass as of time ##t##), ##v(t)## (velocity as of time ##t##), ##f(t)## (force on vehicle at time ##t##) and ##K(t)## (kinetic energy of vehicle at time ##t##)

You present the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation and use it to get an expression for ##v(t)## as ##u \ln ( \frac{m_i}{m_i - Rt})##

You proceed to try to derive a formula for ##f(t)## by considering the momentum change of the vehicle. This approach seems flawed.

There are two contributions to the momentum change of the vehicle. One contribution is the thrust from the rocket motor. The other contribution is the mass flow as fuel is pumped (at negligible relative velocity) into the rocket motor and out of the system of interest.

I am going to stop here at the first discovered error.

One more thing. I applaud the organization, style and clarity of your work. You make it clear what you are doing and why. This is extremely valuable assistance in the troubleshooting process.
 
A problem is what you are doing seems to be with the derivative ##\frac{dp}{dt}##. The external force acts on the rocket, the fuel, and the ejecta. Just looking at the rocket velocity doesn't account for enough momentum. Several ways of doing the accounting are developed in:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-develop-the-rocket-equation.961707/post-6895695

Or the entire thread in general.

Also see the recent insight:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/how-to-apply-newtons-second-law-to-variable-mass-systems/
 
Last edited:
jbriggs444 said:
You proceed to try to derive a formula for ##f(t)## by considering the momentum change of the vehicle. This approach seems flawed.
I agree with this statement. You call ##f(t)## the "external force". What is the system to which this force is external? Specifically, does it include the fuel which at one moment is part of ##m(t)## and the next moment it is not? That issue is clarified in the insight article that @erobz recommended.

Also, it will be prudent to assume that the empty rocket has some mass, to avoid logarithmic singularities when the fuel runs out at which point the acceleration becomes zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K