Problem with making a wavefunction for two particles

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the total wavefunction and energy for two bosons with zero spin, specifically focusing on the ground state and first excited state. Participants are exploring the implications of symmetry in the wavefunctions and the role of the spin component, which is noted to be challenging due to the lack of clarity in available resources.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the nature of the spin state for bosons with zero spin, including its symmetry properties and whether it changes between energy states. There is also discussion about how to combine the spin and spatial parts of the wavefunction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the symmetry of the spin state and the relationship between the spin and spatial wavefunctions. However, there remains uncertainty about the treatment of excited states and the absence of triplet states for these particles. The conversation is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants express difficulty in finding relevant information in their textbooks, indicating a potential gap in the educational material regarding the treatment of spin in this context.

mathlete
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
OK - the question gives me two bosons with 0 spin (and the wavefunctions/energy levels) and tells me to find the total wavefunction and energy for the ground state and first excited state.

Now, I know the total wavefunction must be symmetric. I know the symmetric spatial part. But the spin part, I'm having some problems with. There is only one spin state (since s=0), correct? Now what I do not understand is:

- What is the spin state for s=0?
- Is this spin state symmetric or antisymmetric?
- Does the spin state change going from the ground to the excited state?
- How do I combine it with the spatial part? Just multiply the two together?

Sorry for the many questions but I can't find any of this in my book, it pretty much skips the role of the spin part altogether.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mathlete said:
OK - the question gives me two bosons with 0 spin (and the wavefunctions/energy levels) and tells me to find the total wavefunction and energy for the ground state and first excited state.

Now, I know the total wavefunction must be symmetric. I know the symmetric spatial part. But the spin part, I'm having some problems with. There is only one spin state (since s=0), correct? Now what I do not understand is:

- What is the spin state for s=0?
- Is this spin state symmetric or antisymmetric?
- Does the spin state change going from the ground to the excited state?
- How do I combine it with the spatial part? Just multiply the two together?

Sorry for the many questions but I can't find any of this in my book, it pretty much skips the role of the spin part altogether.

Yes, the spin 0 wavefunction is symmetric since it is an even parity state. Spin wavefunctions are simply multiplied onto the spatial wavefunction. (If you were using kets, then the ket space would be a direct product of the waveket and spinket spaces.)

As far as the excited state is concerned, if you are dealing with elementary spin 0 particles, any system you create will also have spin 0, no matter what the energy state is. If your particles are composite (like pions) this need not be true.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Yes, the spin 0 wavefunction is symmetric since it is an even parity state. Spin wavefunctions are simply multiplied onto the spatial wavefunction. (If you were using kets, then the ket space would be a direct product of the waveket and spinket spaces.)

As far as the excited state is concerned, if you are dealing with elementary spin 0 particles, any system you create will also have spin 0, no matter what the energy state is. If your particles are composite (like pions) this need not be true.

-Dan
Thanks! That's basically what I thought.

Now I have a problem with the excited states... there should be no triplet, correct (since the bosons both of 0 spin only have one spin state). Why wouldn't it just be the same as the ground state with n=2 plugged into the wavefunction instead of n=1 (which represents the ground state)?
 
Last edited:
Also, a bit of an unrelated question... what exactly is the difference in notation between the electron configuration (npn'p) and (np, n'p)?
 
mathlete said:
Thanks! That's basically what I thought.

Now I have a problem with the excited states... there should be no triplet, correct (since the bosons both of 0 spin only have one spin state). Why wouldn't it just be the same as the ground state with n=2 plugged into the wavefunction instead of n=1 (which represents the ground state)?

That is correct, the triplet and singlet states only occur when combining two spin 1/2 particles.

As I said unless there is some reason for the spin wavefunction to depend on the energy of the particle (and I can't think of a reason why there would be for a spin 0 elementary particle) then the only variation in the overall wavefunction is going to be due to the spatial part.

-Dan
 
mathlete said:
OK - the question gives me two bosons with 0 spin (and the wavefunctions/energy levels) and tells me to find the total wavefunction and energy for the ground state and first excited state.

Now, I know the total wavefunction must be symmetric. I know the symmetric spatial part. But the spin part, I'm having some problems with. There is only one spin state (since s=0), correct? Now what I do not understand is:

- What is the spin state for s=0?
- Is this spin state symmetric or antisymmetric?
- Does the spin state change going from the ground to the excited state?
- How do I combine it with the spatial part? Just multiply the two together?

Sorry for the many questions but I can't find any of this in my book, it pretty much skips the role of the spin part altogether.

Spin just doesn't come in at all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K