Problem with perfectly inelastic collisions.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on perfectly inelastic collisions, specifically involving two trucks of different masses colliding head-on. It is established that inelastic collisions conserve momentum, not kinetic energy. The example provided illustrates that if both trucks are traveling at the same speed, their combined mass results in a new velocity that is one-third of the initial speed. The misconception that perfectly inelastic collisions result in zero velocity is clarified, emphasizing that momentum is conserved despite the loss of kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum conservation principles
  • Basic knowledge of inelastic collision dynamics
  • Familiarity with mass and velocity concepts in physics
  • Ability to analyze one-dimensional motion scenarios
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of momentum conservation in various collision types
  • Explore the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn about the mathematical calculations involved in collision problems
  • Investigate real-world applications of inelastic collisions in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding collision mechanics and momentum conservation principles.

Cherryboba
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two trucks, one twice as heavy as the other, collide head on (assume it's one dimensional and easy ;) ) and the collission is perfectly inelastic. If it was perfectly inelastic there would be no kinetic energy left, and therefore no velocity. How do the trucks manage to conserve momentum by moving in the direction of the smaller truck if they have no energy?

Please help out, I've been searching for days.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An inelastic collision isn't necessarily one in which all of the kinetic energy is lost. Its simply one in which the kinetic energy isn't necessarily conserved.

Inelastic collisions are determined by conservation of momentum alone. In your example, if both trucks are going at the same speed, they would have a resulting velocity (one third of the initial).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K