Undergrad Problem with this estimation lemma example

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of an integral involving the function $$\frac{ze^{ikz}}{z^2+a^2}$$ along a specific contour C as U approaches infinity. The user is attempting to apply the residue theorem but is confused about the behavior of the integral due to the poles at $$ia$$ and $$-ia$$. It is noted that if neither pole is inside the contour C, the integral evaluates to zero, indicating the function is analytic in that region. The user is encouraged to focus on the exponential decay factor $$|e^{ikz}|=e^{-kU}$$ to simplify the estimation of the integral. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the contour and the positioning of the poles for accurate evaluation.
Jenny short
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to show that

$$\lim_{U\rightarrow\infty}\int_C \frac{ze^{ikz}}{z^2+a^2}dz = 0 $$

Where $$R>2a$$ and $$k>0$$ And C is the curve, defined by $$C = {x+iU | -R\le x\le R}$$

I have tried by using the fact that

$$|\int_C \frac{ze^{ikz}}{z^2+a^2}dz| \le\int_C |\frac{ze^{ikz}}{z^2+a^2}|
|dz|$$

I want to use the fact $$|e^{ikz}|=e^{-kU}$$

However I got really stuck after that. I would really appreciate help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not understand your description of the curve C. Anyhow, z^{2}+a^{2}=(z-ia)(z+ia), so you have poles in ia and -ia. The residue at ia is \frac{iae^{-ka}}{2ia}=\frac{e^{-ka}}{2}. Now you just have to calculate the other residue and use the residue theorem...
 
Last edited:
|\frac{ze^{ikx}}{z^2+a^2}|\leq e^{-kU}|\frac{z}{z^2+a^2}|

Does that help?
 
mathman said:
|\frac{ze^{ikx}}{z^2+a^2}|\leq e^{-kU}|\frac{z}{z^2+a^2}|

Does that help?
I've done that, but I'm suck on what to do after that
 
To continue what I said above: As long as C is given by \vert z\vert=R with R>\vert a \vert, the value of the integral is given by 2\pi i\sum Res_{\vert z \vert <R}.
 
Last edited:
More information: If neither ia or -ia is inside C, then the function is analytic there, thus the integral must be 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
796
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K