Product of modular forms: poles, zeros expansion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of modular forms, specifically addressing the conditions under which the product of two modular forms, \( f(t) \) and \( g(t) \), belongs to the space \( M_2 \) or \( M^{!}_2 \). It is established that if there is no zero of order \( N \) at infinity, the product lies in \( M^{!}_2 \) with a zero constant coefficient. Conversely, if a zero of order \( N \) exists at infinity, the product belongs to \( M_2 \) and the constant coefficient is generally non-zero. The participants clarify the implications of coefficients in the Fourier expansion and the relationship between spaces \( S_k \) and \( M_k \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular forms, particularly \( M_k \) and \( S_k \).
  • Familiarity with Fourier expansions in the context of modular forms.
  • Knowledge of holomorphic functions and their behavior at infinity.
  • Concept of poles and zeros in complex analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of modular forms, focusing on the differences between \( M_k \) and \( S_k \).
  • Learn about the implications of coefficients in Fourier expansions of modular forms.
  • Explore the concept of holomorphic functions and their behavior near infinity.
  • Investigate the classification of poles and zeros in complex analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in number theory and modular forms, as well as students tackling advanced topics in complex analysis and algebraic structures.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


zeropole.png


question concerning part c.

Homework Equations



The question is pretty simple if there is no zero of order ##N## at infinity, such that it does not cancel the pole of ##f(t)## at infinity of order ##N##.

In this case it follows that ## f(t) g(t) \in M^{!}_2 ## and so we just set the constant coefficient to zero.

However, if there is a zero of order ##N## at infinity then ##f(t)g(t) \in M_2 ## instead, and the constant coefficient is not zero in general.

So my question is how do we know there is not a zero of order ##N## at infinity?

The Attempt at a Solution



From what I understand the expansion of ##f(t)## in terms of ##q## is the expansion of ##f(t)## near ##\infty## and it is holomorphic - no pole at ##\infty##- if there are no negative coefficients, and if there are negative coefficients the last one gives the order of the pole.

However for positive coefficients it runs to ##\infty ## , how do you deduce the order of any zeros? or
 

Attachments

  • zeropole.png
    zeropole.png
    21.9 KB · Views: 986
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
So my question is how do we know there is not a zero of order ##N## at infinity?

Ok, so I think this is obvious since ##g(t) \in M_k ## not ##S_k## so there is no zero at ##q=\infty## due to the non-zero constant coefficient. HOWEVER, so in the case a function ## \in S_k ## there is a zero at ##\infty## and from the Fourier expansion ##\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty} q^n ## wouln't i conlclude it is a zero of order infinity? But I suspect this is wrong? thanks
 
binbagsss said:
Ok, so I think this is obvious since ##g(t) \in M_k ## not ##S_k## so there is no zero at ##q=\infty## due to the non-zero constant coefficient. HOWEVER, so in the case a function ## \in S_k ## there is a zero at ##\infty## and from the Fourier expansion ##\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty} q^n ## wouln't i conlclude it is a zero of order infinity? But I suspect this is wrong? thanks

actually no, since ##S_k## is a sub-group of ##M_k ## so we haven't necessarily been told that there is a non-vanishing constant coefficient.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K