1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Programming Function With Cut On Negative Imaginary Axis

  1. Aug 27, 2014 #1
    The Function To Be Programmed

    [itex]\sigma_m=\frac{4(n_r^2 -1)J_m(n_r k R)}{\pi^2kD_m^+(kR)D_m^-(kR)}[/itex]



    The '+'/'-' superscripts indicate the limits as z approaches the branch cut, which lies along the negative imaginary half axis, from the positive and negative real sides. The J's and H's are the Bessel functions and Hankel functions of the first kind. I wish to plot this function along the negative imaginary half-axis with respect to k.

    My Code

    I'm coding this in Python using NumPy and SciPy. Here is my code at present:

    import scipy as sp
    import numpy as np
    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
    from numpy import pi
    from scipy.special import jv, iv, kv, jvp, ivp, kvp

    m = 11 # Mode number
    nr = 2 # Index of refraction
    R = 1 # Radius of cylinder
    eps = 10e-8 # The Dm's in the denominator are evaluated an amount eps to the left and right of the cut

    def yv_imcut(n, z):
    return -2/(pi*(1j)**n)*kv(n, -1j*z) + 2*(1j)**n/pi * (0.5j*pi) * iv(n,-1j*z)

    def yvp_imcut(n, z):
    return (n/z)*yv_imcut(n,z) - yv_imcut(n+1,z)

    def hankel1_imcut(n, z):
    return jv(n, z) + 1j*yv_imcut(n, z)

    def h1vp_imcut(n, z):
    return jvp(n, z, 1) + 1j*yvp_imcut(n, z)

    # Define the characteristic equation
    def Dm(n, z):
    return nr*jvp(n, nr*z, 1) * hankel1_imcut(n, z) - jv(n, nr*z)*h1vp_imcut(n,z)

    # Define the cut pole density function. The product in the denominator has been written out explicitly for computational reasons.
    def sigma(k,n):
    return 4*(nr**2 - 1)*jv(n,nr*k*R)/(pi**2 * k * ((Dm(n, k*R-eps).real)**2 + (Dm(n, k*R+eps).imag)**2))

    k = np.linspace(0, -15j,1000)
    y = sigma(k,m)
    x = np.linspace(0,15,1000)

    plt.plot(x, y.imag)

    With the help of others, I have successfully moved the cut of the Hankel and Neumann functions from the negative real axis to the negative imaginary axis using argument transforms found here. You can confirm this by running the program and plotting the _imcut functions versus their regular counterparts.

    Here's the plot of sigma.imag along the negative imaginary semi-axis:
    Here's what it should look like (look at the blue m=11 curve at right):

    As you can see, it looks sort of right, but it's taking on the wrong values.
    These equations and the graph come from page 4 in this article: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.0245v1.pdf. Something that the article mentions is that sigma should be a purely imaginary function. I examined the function to see what could be making it part real and part imaginary in my case. I found that the Dm's in the denominator of sigma have equal real and opposite imaginary parts, so I expanded the product to ensure that it comes out purely real (the precision of the two numbers lead to an imaginary part which shouldn't have been there). Still, it isn't working out. Any help would be appreciated! I've been stumped for half of the summer by this one.
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 1, 2014 #2
    I've made another attempt at the problem, but I get the exact same result. Here it is:

    In Appendix B it is stated that

    From this relation one can also find the difference of the first derivative of the Hankel function across the cut:

    I wrote a script with these formulae:

    def hankel1_minus(n,z):
    return hankel1(n,z) - 4*jv(n,z)

    def h1vp_minus(n,z):
    return (n/z)*hankel1_minus(n,z) - hankel1_minus(n+1,z)

    def Dm_plus(n, z):
    return nr *jvp(n, nr*z, 1) * hankel1(n, z) - jv(n, nr*z)*h1vp(n,z)

    def Dm_minus(n, z):
    return nr *jvp(n, nr*z, 1) * hankel1_minus(n,z) - jv(n, nr*z)*h1vp_minus(n,z)

    def sigma(k,n):
    return 4*(nr**2 - 1)*jv(n,nr*k*R)/(pi**2 * k * (Dm_plus(n, k*R) * Dm_minus(n,k*R)).real)

    Does anyone have even a vague clue as to what could be going wrong? I've rewritten the code in OCTAVE as well and have been met with the same results. This tells me that there is something fundamentally wrong with my process. Any hints?
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2014
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted