Projected motion/trajectory question [EASY]

  • Thread starter Thread starter ujellytek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
ujellytek
Messages
35
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The rock 'A' is dropped 100m above a river. After 2 seconds, rock 'B' is thrown down from the same height. What initial velocity must be given to rock 'B' so that both rocks hit the river at the exact same time? [No air resistance]

Homework Equations


What is the answer?

The Attempt at a Solution


http://imgur.com/a/59fkU[/B]

Rock A: v1=0 During a 2s drop it travels 19.6m, -4.9(2)^2+100
So the equation for rock A is d=-4.9(t)^2+80.4
When will rock A hit the river? isolate t and I get ~4.0507 seconds

Rock B: v1=? equation is easy to set up: d=-4.9(t)^2+v1(t)+100 (starts 19.6m behind the dropped rock)
Now we sub in the time rock A hits the river: (4.9(4.0507)^2-100) * (4.0507)^-1=v1
This gives me an answer of ~-4.849m/s
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
That's relevant equations, not relevant questions. What common kinematic equations might apply to this problem?

Your attempt at solution image is barely readable if at all. Please type in your attempt.
 
gneill said:
That's relevant equations, not relevant questions. What common kinematic equations might apply to this problem?

Your attempt at solution image is barely readable if at all. Please type in your attempt.
Done
 
ujellytek said:
Rock A: v1=0 During a 2s drop it travels 19.6m, -4.9(2)^2+100
So the equation for rock A is d=-4.9(t)^2+80.4
When will rock A hit the river? isolate t and I get ~4.0507 seconds
I think you forgot the velocity that rock A had attained by the time it reached the 2 second mark when you wrote its equation. I think you'll find that the time remaining for rock A to hit the water from the 2 second point is much less than 4 seconds.
 
gneill said:
I think you forgot the velocity that rock A had attained by the time it reached the 2 second mark when you wrote its equation. I think you'll find that the time remaining for rock A to hit the water from the 2 second point is much less than 4 seconds.
You're right, thanks. The velocity then turns out to be ~27.38m/s instead of 4.849m/s
 
That certainly looks better! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K