Projectile Motion at an Angle: Solving for Time, Distance, and Final Velocity

Click For Summary
A projectile is launched from a 125 m cliff at 50.0 m/s and 37.0° above the horizontal. The initial calculations for time to reach the ground yielded 3.1 seconds, but this was incorrect as it did not account for the vertical displacement. The user attempted to use the quadratic formula to solve for time, realizing that the height should be treated as a negative displacement. They encountered issues with negative square roots and acknowledged the need to correctly incorporate the height in their calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of considering vertical motion when solving projectile motion problems.
Precepts
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need someone to check if I did this right. As I got the q's off a PDF with no answers.

Homework Statement



A projectile is shot from the edge of a cliff 125 m above the ground. It has an initial velocity 50.0 m/s 37.0° above the horizontal at the launch point. a) Determine the time taken to reach the ground. b) How far is this point from the base of the cliff? c) What is the magnitude and direction of the final velocity just before the point of impact?

It doesn't specify what value to use for gravity, I assumed g, or a, is = -9.8m/s^2
(Doesn't matter since there's no answers anyway)

Homework Equations



v = u + at
s = ut (horizontal sense)

The Attempt at a Solution

I used this to find the time for a)

Vv = Uv + Avt
0 = 50 * sin37 - 9.8t
9.8t = 50 * sin37
t = 3.1s

b) Sh = Uh * t
= 50 * cos37 * 3.1
Sh = 123.79m

c) Vertical component before impact:

Vv = Uv + Avt
= 60.47m/s

I then used Pythagoras' to find v = 72.47m/s
and theta = 56'33'' above the horizontal. I feel that I went wrong somewhere, can someone check if these are right/close. Not sure If I copied everything down correctly either, my page is a bit of a mess.edit - I just noticed I didn't once use the vertical distance, I think I'll have another look at it.

edit 2 - Sv = Uvt + 1/2At^2
125 = 50 sin 37t -4.9t^2
= 30.1t - 4.9t^2

-4.9t^2 + 30.1t - 125 = 0
4.9t^2 - 30.1t +125 = 0

And... I'm getting math error when using quadratic formula. Not quite sure where to go from here...I realize now that the value for t that I had would only reach to the same height on the other side of the parabola... I'll have a look at this question again later.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
a)Vv = Uv + Avt
0 = 50 * sin37 - 9.8t
9.8t = 50 * sin37
t = 3.1s

The vertical component of the speed is not 0 when it hits the ground!
 
Basic_Physics said:
a)Vv = Uv + Avt
0 = 50 * sin37 - 9.8t
9.8t = 50 * sin37
t = 3.1s

The vertical component of the speed is not 0 when it hits the ground!


Right, lol.

Can you find t? I tried to incorporate the height and use the quadratic formula, but it wouldn't solve. Kind of stuck here.
 
Found it. I had to use a negative displacement for the height... I was getting a negative square root prior. Wow...
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K