Projectile Motion Help: Proving Equations for Velocity and Time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving equations related to projectile motion, specifically the relationships between velocities at points A, B, and C, and their corresponding angles and times. The key equations to prove are v3*t1 = v1*t2 and 1/v1 + 1/v3 = (2*cos β)/v2. The user attempts to derive these equations using trigonometric identities and horizontal component consistency, but encounters difficulties in manipulation and understanding the physical significance of the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations in detail
  • Learn advanced trigonometric identities and their applications
  • Explore kinematic equations for varying angles of projection
  • Investigate the physical significance of velocity components in projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and projectile motion, as well as educators looking for examples of trigonometric applications in physics problems.

elphin
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
projectile motion help needed!

Homework Statement



If v1, v2, v3 are the velocities at three points A, B , C of the path of a projectile, where the inclinations to the horizon are α, α-β, α-2β and if t1, t2 are the times of describing the arcs AB and BC respectively, prove that

v3*t1 = v1*t2 and 1/ v1 + 1/v3 = (2*cos β)/v2


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



v1cos α = v2cos (α-β)= v3cos (α-2β) - (horizontal component same always)

and

v2sin(α-β) = v1sin α – g*t1 (&) v3sin (α-2β) = v2sin(α-β) – g*t2

and now I am stuck .. are there any more equations that I am missing or is it a bad case of trigonometric manipulation.. I tried trigonometric manipulation .. but ended up getting weirder equations
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think it's a case of choosing the right trigonometric manipulations. I got the second relation-

Using your formulas,

[itex]\frac{1}{v_{1}}+\frac{1}{v_{2}}=\frac{cos(\alpha)}{v_{2} cos(\alpha-2\beta)}+\frac{cos(\alpha-\beta)}{v_{2} cos(\alpha-\beta)}[/itex]

[itex]cos(\alpha) + cos(\alpha-2\beta) = cos(\alpha) + cos(\alpha)cos(2\beta) - sin(\alpha)sin(2\beta)[/itex]
[itex]cos(\alpha) + cos(\alpha-2\beta) = cos(\alpha)(1+cos(2\beta)) - 2sin(\alpha)sin(\beta)cos(\beta)[/itex]
[itex]cos(\alpha) + cos(\alpha-2\beta) = cos(\alpha)(1+2cos^{2}(\beta)-1) - 2sin(\alpha)sin(\beta)cos(\beta)[/itex]
[itex]cos(\alpha) + cos(\alpha-2\beta) = 2cos(\beta)(cos(\alpha)cos(\beta)-sin(\alpha)sin(\beta)) = 2cos(\beta)cos(\alpha-\beta)[/itex]

Resubstitute and get the required result. However I don't see any physical significance to this..
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K