Projectile Problem: Solving an Artillery Shell Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zdub311
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
AI Thread Summary
An artillery shell is fired at a 30-degree angle with a velocity of 3000 ft/s and explodes after 2.5 seconds, resulting in two pieces. The first piece weighs 30 lbs and lands at coordinates (900, 400, 0) ft after 4.5 seconds. To determine the landing point of the second piece, kinematic equations and conservation of momentum must be applied. The velocity of the first piece can be calculated using its landing time and position, which will then allow for the calculation of the second piece's velocity and trajectory. The assumption is made that the explosion does not impart additional energy to the pieces.
Zdub311
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




An artillery shell is fired from the origin in the x direction(z is vertically upward) at an angle of 30degrees above the horizontal axis at a velocity of 3000 ft/s. after 2.5a the shell which weighs 100lb explodes into two pieces. The first piece to land weighs 30 lbs and lands at (900,400,0)ft at 4.5 s after the gun was fired. When and where does the other piece land? Neglect air resistance and assume

Homework Equations


Not sure on these but I have x_e=v cos theta(t) and z_e=v sin theta(t)_e -1/2gt_e^2 and t_e=o


The Attempt at a Solution



Really need some inspiration with this one guys. This is my first physics class btw!

Thank you for any attempted help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Although a 3000 level undergrad physics course. This question probably belongs in the beginner forum!
 
I would use the kinematic equations, I think they are what you have listed, the notation throws me off a bit. Using those you should be able to find the velocity of the particle at the point it explodes, and also find out the velocity and angle of the first piece. From there conservation of momentum should be able to give you the velocity and angle for the second piece, and using the kinematic equations once again will give you what it asks for. This assumes the explosion doesn't impart any energy into the pieces.
 
nejibanana said:
This assumes the explosion doesn't impart any energy into the pieces.

A change in kinetic energy doesn't matter. The assumption is that the two pieces contain all the mass of the shell. That means you can use conservation of momentum at the time when the shell explodes.

Find where the shell is at 2.5s.
Then find the velocity vector after the explosion for the 30lb piece, so it lands at the given time and place.
Then use conservation of momentum to find the velocity vector of the other piece after the explosion.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top