Projection Operators: Explaining |m|2*|m|2 = |m|4

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Somali_Physicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Projection
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
Somali_Physicist
Messages
117
Reaction score
13
Take a projection operatorPm=|m><m|
However if the ket of m is a column matrix of m x 1 and its bra the complex conjugate with 1 x m length
therefore <m|m> = |m|2
since the m here is the same since projection operator is the same.
if A is a matrix
B = A
A*B=B*A

but Pm*Pm = Pm (Projection operator)
but this makes no sense as |m|2*|m|2 = |m|4

Can anyone explain?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Dr Transport said:
Writte it out in Dirac notation as you already have done and it pops out immediately.
Pm*Pm=(|m><m|)(|m><m|) = |m><m|m><m|=|m><m| only if |m|^2 = 1
 
Somali_Physicist said:
m here is the same the projection operator is the same
Same as what ?
Note that <m|m> = 1 so that indeed P2=P (and your |m| = 1)

Page 5 (page number 59) here
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
Same as what ?
Note that <m|m> = I so that indeed P2=P (and your |m| = 1)
hmm but let's take a bra <m| is a row matrix of 2 elements in the dual vector space V*
and |m> is the corresponding column matrix of two elements in the vector of vector space V
now no matter which configuration i multiply these two things ( or which ever way they act on each other)
the corressponding matrix multiplication is the same value.

<m|m>=|m><m| = |m|^2
or is this system essentially assuming the magnitude is 1?
 
Somali_Physicist said:
Take a projection operatorPm=|m><m|
However if the ket of m is a column matrix of m x 1 and its bra the complex conjugate with 1 x m length
therefore <m|m> = |m|2

Where are you getting that from? Let's take a simple example:

##|\psi\rangle = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right)##

(I don't want to use ##|m\rangle## because that's mixing up the number of components with the index of the component.)

Then ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle =\left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) = 1##

The projection operator ##P_\psi = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{array} \right)##

You can see that ##(P_\psi)^2 = P_\psi##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Somali_Physicist and BvU
Somali_Physicist said:
hmm but let's take a bra <m| is a row matrix of 2 elements in the dual vector space V*
and |m> is the corresponding column matrix of two elements in the vector of vector space V
now no matter which configuration i multiply these two things ( or which ever way they act on each other)
the corressponding matrix multiplication is the same value.

<m|m>=|m><m| = |m|^2
or is this system essentially assuming the magnitude is 1?

Yes. ##|\psi\rangle \langle \psi|## is a projection operator only if ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle = 1##
 
stevendaryl said:
Where are you getting that from? Let's take a simple example:

##|\psi\rangle = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right)##

(I don't want to use ##|m\rangle## because that's mixing up the number of components with the index of the component.)

Then ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle =\left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) = 1##

The projection operator ##P_\psi = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{array} \right)##

You can see that ##(P_\psi)^2 = P_\psi##
Ahh thanks that explains it, i assumed commutativity!
 
stevendaryl said:
Yes. ##|\psi\rangle \langle \psi|## is a projection operator only if ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle = 1##
That also sorts my other conundrum.So for these transformations only can have 1s and 0s in it.The projection operator has the element at the Pm,m.My book used a value "n" at that position which i thought implied non 1 values.
 
Somali_Physicist said:
That also sorts my other conundrum.So for these transformations only can have 1s and 0s in it.The projection operator has the element at the Pm,m.My book used a value "n" at that position which i thought implied non 1 values.
The matrix representation of a projection operator can have elements other than 1 and 0. Try construction the projection operator ##\hat{P}_{\psi}## for
$$
| \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( |+\rangle + |-\rangle \right)
$$
in the ##\left\{ |+\rangle, |-\rangle \right\}## basis.
 
Somali_Physicist said:
hmm but let's take a bra <m| is a row matrix of 2 elements in the dual vector space V*
and |m> is the corresponding column matrix of two elements in the vector of vector space V
now no matter which configuration i multiply these two things ( or which ever way they act on each other)
the corressponding matrix multiplication is the same value.

<m|m>=|m><m| = |m|^2
or is this system essentially assuming the magnitude is 1?
Projectors are idempotent in this sense
##\langle m |( |m\rangle\langle m |) m\rangle = 1## and inserting more projectors has no effect
##\langle m |(|m\rangle\langle m |m\rangle\langle m |) m\rangle = 1##