Projection to Invariant Functions:

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of measure preserving ergodic transformations and the relationships between certain function spaces, specifically the perpendicularity of functions to invariant functions and the representation of projection operators in this context. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 introduces the problem of understanding the claim that if a function f is perpendicular to the span E of eigenfunctions, then it is also perpendicular to the set V_n of invariant functions.
  • Post 2 suggests an inductive argument to demonstrate that f is perpendicular to V_n, starting with the case for V1 and extending to higher n.
  • Post 3 raises a question about the representation of the projection operator P as an integral operator, expressing confusion about the kernel and the finite nature of the sets involved.
  • Post 4 indicates that the author of Post 3 has resolved their question regarding the projection operator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial claim regarding the perpendicularity of f to V_n, as the discussion includes differing viewpoints and unresolved questions about the projection operator.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of the spaces E and V_n, and the assumptions made in the inductive argument proposed in Post 2. The nature of the sets A_i and the role of the parameter l in Post 3 remain unclear.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers and students interested in ergodic theory, functional analysis, and the properties of measure preserving transformations may find this discussion relevant.

l'Hôpital
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
Context:
T : X \rightarrow X is a measure preserving ergodic transformation of a probability measure space X. Let V_n = \{ g | g \circ T^n = g \} and E = span [ \{g | g \circ T = \lambda g, for some \lambda \} ] be the span of the eigenfunctions of the induced operator T : L^2 \rightarrow L^2, Tf = f \circ T.

Problem:
I was reading this paper by Fursternberg and Weiss where they implicitly claim if f \perp E then f \perp V_n. However, I don't see how this isso.

Some help would be greatly appreciated. : )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can do an inductive argument. For example f us perpendicular to V1 obviously. If g is in V2, then g+gT is in E, as is g-gT. So both of these are perpendicular to f, and therefore their sum is as well. You can probably keep working your way up.
 
Ooh! I like it! Awesome, thanks!

One more question:

They also makes a claim as follows. Let P : L^2 \rightarrow V_{n} be the projection operator. Then, it can be represented as an integral operator with kernel K(x,y) = l\sum_{i=1}^{l} 1_{A_i} (x) 1_{A_i} (y) where \cup A_i = X are T^n-invariant sets. I don't see how this is even possible, nor where the l comes into play, or how they can have only finitely many. Any ideas with this one?
 
Nevermind, got it! Thanks anyways!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
745