Projection to Invariant Functions:

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
l'Hôpital
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
Context:
[itex]T : X \rightarrow X[/itex] is a measure preserving ergodic transformation of a probability measure space [itex]X[/itex]. Let [itex]V_n = \{ g | g \circ T^n = g \}[/itex] and [itex]E = span [ \{g | g \circ T = \lambda g,[/itex] for some [itex]\lambda \} ][/itex] be the span of the eigenfunctions of the induced operator [itex]T : L^2 \rightarrow L^2[/itex], [itex]Tf = f \circ T[/itex].

Problem:
I was reading this paper by Fursternberg and Weiss where they implicitly claim if [itex]f \perp E[/itex] then [itex]f \perp V_n[/itex]. However, I don't see how this isso.

Some help would be greatly appreciated. : )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can do an inductive argument. For example f us perpendicular to V1 obviously. If g is in V2, then g+gT is in E, as is g-gT. So both of these are perpendicular to f, and therefore their sum is as well. You can probably keep working your way up.
 
Ooh! I like it! Awesome, thanks!

One more question:

They also makes a claim as follows. Let [itex]P : L^2 \rightarrow V_{n}[/itex] be the projection operator. Then, it can be represented as an integral operator with kernel [itex]K(x,y) = l\sum_{i=1}^{l} 1_{A_i} (x) 1_{A_i} (y)[/itex] where [itex]\cup A_i = X[/itex] are [itex]T^n[/itex]-invariant sets. I don't see how this is even possible, nor where the [itex]l[/itex] comes into play, or how they can have only finitely many. Any ideas with this one?
 
Nevermind, got it! Thanks anyways!