Proof: [3x] = [x] + [x + 1/3] + [x + 2/3]

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicnicman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the equation [3x] = [x] + [x + 1/3] + [x + 2/3], where [x] denotes the floor function. The discussion centers around the behavior of the floor function in relation to different cases based on the fractional part of x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the equation by considering three cases based on the value of the fractional part of x (E). Participants question the clarity and potential typos in the original post's reasoning.

Discussion Status

Participants are reviewing the original poster's approach, with some expressing confidence in the correctness of the reasoning while acknowledging the possibility of typographical errors. The discussion appears to be constructive, focusing on refining the argument.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster is seeking feedback on their proof, suggesting a collaborative effort to ensure accuracy and clarity in the presentation of the argument.

nicnicman
Messages
132
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Note: [x] denotes the floor of x.

Prove that [3x] = [x] + [x + 1/3] + [x + 2/3]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let x = n + E, where n is an integer and 0≤ E < 1. We have three cases:

Case 1: 0 ≤ E < 1/3
3x = 3n + 3E and [3x] = 3n, since 0 ≤ 3E < 1.
[x + 1/3} = n, since x + 1/3 = n + (1/3 + E) and 0 ≤ 1/3 + E < 1.
[x + 2/3} = n, since x + 2/3 = n + (2/3 + E) and 0 ≤ 1/3 + E < 1.
Thus, [3x] = 3n, and [x] + [x + 1/3] + [x + 2/3] = n + n + n = 3n.

Case 2: 1/3 ≤ E < 2/3
3x = 3n = 3E = (3n + 1) + (3E -1) and [3x] = 3n + 1, since 0 ≤ 3E - 1 < 1.
[x + 1/3] = n, since x + 1/3 = n + (1/3 + E) and 0 ≤ 1/3 + E < 1.
[x + 2/3] = [n + (2/3 + E)] = [n + 1 + (E - 1/3)] = n + 1, since 0 ≤ E - 1/3 < 1.
Thus, [3x] = 3n + 1, and [x] + [x + 1/3] + [x + 2/3] = n + n + (n + 1) = 3n + 1.

Case 3: 2/3 ≤ E < 1
3x = 3n = 3E = (3n + 2) + (3E -2) and [3x] = 3n + 2, since 0 ≤ 3E - 2 < 1.
[x + 1/3] = [n + (1/3 + E)] = [n + 1 + (E - 2/3)] = n + 1, since 0 ≤ E - 2/3 < 1.
[x + 2/3] = [n + (2/3 + E)] = [n + 1 + (E - 1/3)] = n + 1, since 0 ≤ E - 1/3 < 1.
Thus, [3x] = 3n + 2, and [x] + [x + 1/3] + [x + 2/3] = n + (n + 1) + (n + 1) = 3n + 2.

How does this look? I just want to make sure I'm not over looking something.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any comments?
 
nicnicman said:
Any comments?

Doesn't look like you missed anything to me. I might have missed a typo in a line or two, but it's certainly the right idea.
 
Yeah, there's a pretty good chance there's at least one typo. Thanks for looking it over I know it's tedious--I spent more time writing it than I care to admit.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K