Proof: between 2 reals is an irrational

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArcanaNoir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that between any two real numbers, there exists at least one irrational number. The original poster presents a proof that considers both cases of the second real number being either rational or irrational.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the proof and suggest clarifications, such as introducing the concept of delta to define the proximity of irrational numbers to the given reals. There is also a consideration of using different irrational numbers, like \(\sqrt{2}\), to simplify the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants providing feedback on the proof and exploring alternative approaches. Some participants express agreement with the proof's validity while others suggest modifications to enhance clarity and rigor.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of proving the irrationality of certain numbers and discuss the implications of using different examples, such as \(\pi\) and \(\sqrt{2}\). There is also mention of the broader implications of the proof regarding transcendental numbers.

ArcanaNoir
Messages
778
Reaction score
4
I'd like to know if this indeed proves that between any 2 reals is an irrational.

Choose two reals A and B, B>A. There are two cases of B: B is irrational or B is rational. Assume B is irrational. Then B- \frac{1}{n} (n is a natural number) is irrational. You can get as close as you like to B by taking n sufficienly large. Thus, between a real A and an irrational B, an irrational.
Next, assume B is rational. Then, B- \frac{\pi}{n} is irrational. By making n sufficiently large you can get as close as you like to B. Thus, between a real A and a rational B, there is always an irrational.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that's a valid proof. You might want to clarify it a little by letting \delta= B- A and saying that, for sufficiently large n, 1/n and \pi/n is less than \delta.
 
This looks quite good, ArcanaNoir! :smile:

(of course the proof isn't elementary since it requires you to know that \pi is irrational, which can be difficult to prove)
 
micromass said:
This looks quite good, ArcanaNoir! :smile:

(of course the proof isn't elementary since it requires you to know that \pi is irrational, which can be difficult to prove)

I think this could be made elementary by using \sqrt{2} in place of \pi, since the irrationality of \sqrt{2} is quite easy to prove by contradiction. :biggrin:
But then I suppose using \pi for this proof also works to prove that there are transcendental numbers (a stronger attribute than irrational) between any two reals, as well (since \pi is also transcendental), am I right?
 
Thanks for the feedback. @HallsofIvy: yes, I was thinking that too, about using a delta or maybe an epsilon.

@micromass + BrianMath: pi was just the first irrational I thought of, and since the irrationality of accepted irrationals was not in question, I went with it. I agree the sq root of 2 might be a safer choice though.

Incidentally, so there's not one "blanket proof" of whether a number is irrational? Slippery little buggers they are...
 
Also note that your proof actually shows something stronger. It shows that between every two reals is a transcendental! :smile:

And with some modifications, you can even show the following: between every two reals is an element of the form \pi+q with q a rational. So \pi+\mathbb{Q} is dense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K