Proof ε-δ: Epsilon Delta Proof of lim x->a of ((3x²-3a²)/(x-a)) = 6a

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the epsilon-delta proof for the limit as x approaches a of the function ((3x²-3a²)/(x-a)), which equals 6a. The proof involves demonstrating that |f(x) – 6a| can be expressed as |3(x²-2ax+a²)/(x-a)|, simplifying to |3x-3a|. The critical step is establishing that for ε > 0, one can choose δ = ε/3 to ensure |f(x) – 6a| < ε, confirming the limit. The proof emphasizes the importance of clear explanations to avoid losing points on technical assignments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with epsilon-delta definitions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of continuity and differentiability concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Practice additional epsilon-delta proofs for various functions
  • Explore the implications of limits in calculus, particularly in continuity
  • Learn about the application of limits in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus courses, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to master the epsilon-delta proof technique for limits.

Dani4941
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I’m going to say from the beginning that I need to hand this problem in. I'm not looking for the answer, I think I already have it, just want a critical eye.

I need someone to look over this problem and tell me if it's good. Not just if it's right but if it's perfect. I always get the problem right then get minus points because I didn't explain it enough.

So here it is

Give an ε-δ proof of
lim x->a of ((3x²-3a²)/(x-a)) = 6a

Proof: Note |f(x) – a| = |f(x) – 6a| = | (3x²-3a²-6ax-6a²)/(x-a) | = | (3(x²-2ax+a²)/(x-a)) | = |3x-3a|

|3x-3a|<ε (get rid of 3 to make it smaller) |x-a|<ε when |x-a|<δ let δ=ε


Given ε>δ let δ=ε

0<|x-a|<δ then
|f(x) – a| = |3x-3a|<δ=ε

Therefore
lim x->a of ((3x²-3a²)/(x-a)) = 6a
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you really need to say is let d = e/3
Then you get |x-a|<d ==> |3x-3a|< 3*d =e, which is what you needed.
Up to there it was fine though
 
ooo Thanks. That was a pretty large mistake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K