Proof involving FTC to two variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter hholzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Variables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) to functions of two variables, specifically addressing the relationship between mixed partial derivatives and double integrals. It establishes that if \(\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} = f(x,y)\), then the double integral over region \(R = [a,b] \times [c,d]\) is given by \(\int \int_R f(x,y) dA = F(b,d) - F(a,d) - F(b,c) + F(a,c)\). The confusion arises when integrating the inner integral, leading to the result being interpreted as \(F_y\) instead of \(F_x\), highlighting the importance of correctly applying Fubini's theorem and Clairaut's theorem for mixed derivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mixed partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Knowledge of Fubini's theorem
  • Concept of Clairaut's theorem on equality of mixed partials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Fubini's theorem in multiple integrals
  • Explore Clairaut's theorem and its implications for mixed derivatives
  • Practice problems involving double integrals and partial derivatives
  • Review the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for functions of several variables
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators focusing on multivariable calculus and the properties of partial derivatives.

hholzer
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I'm given the following:
If \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} = f(x,y)
then
<br /> \int \int_R f(x,y) dA = F(b,d) - F(a, d) - F(b, c) + F(a, c)<br />

Where R = [a,b] x [c,d]

My question: by integrating the inner integral, we get:

<br /> \int_a^b \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} dx = \left[ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}\right]_a^b<br />

But this result is F_y. I was expecting F_x. Why? Because:

<br /> \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} = F_xy<br />

Which means: we differentiate with respect to x, then with respect to y.
The result above seemingly implies that we differentiated with
respect to y, then with respect to x. Hence, integrating F_yx,
gives F_y, is this not correct? Or do they apply fubini's theorem
and Clairaut's theorem above?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as the derivatives are continuous, the to ways of differentiating a mixed second derivative are equal:
\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}= \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}.

By integrating \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x\partial y} with respect to x, you've "undone" the differentiation with respect to x leaving \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K