Proof of (a^-1)^-1 = a in Group (G, ⋅) | Inverse Property

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4Fun
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inverse property in group theory, specifically that for any element \( a \) in a group \( (G, \circ) \), the inverse of the inverse, \( (a^{-1})^{-1} \), equals \( a \).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish the equality by using the definition of inverses and the identity element. They express uncertainty about their reasoning process. Some participants suggest leveraging the associative property of groups to support the proof. Others inquire about general strategies for approaching proofs in group theory.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different lines of reasoning and questioning the validity of various approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of associativity, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive proof method.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the absence of a universal method for tackling such proofs and reflect on the learning process involved in developing intuition for group properties.

4Fun
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let (G,\circ) be a group. Show that \foralla\inG (a^{-1})^{-1} = a

The Attempt at a Solution



I came up with the following. a^{-1} is the inverse of (a^{-1})^{-1}, therefore we have:

a^{-1} \circ (a^{-1})^{-1} = e
But for a^{-1} \circ (a^{-1})^{-1} to be equal to e, it has to be the case that:
a^{-1} \circ a = e
, therefore (a^{-1})^{-1} has to be equal to a.

Now I think the proof is incorrect, but I'm not sure. I think the mistake is trying to imply that (a^{-1})^{-1} is equal to a, just because both a^{-1} \circ (a^{-1})^{-1} and a^{-1} \circ a are equal to a. Is this a valid proof technique?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, isn't a group associative?
Thus,

We have:
a^-1(ring)(a^-1)^-1=e

so that:
a(ring)(a^-1(ring)(a^-1)^-1))=a(ring)e (*)

Invoking associativity on LHS in (*) should do the trick.
 
Ah yes, didn't think of that option. Thanks a lot for your help.

In general if you try to prove equalities like this, what should you think about? Should you just consider all definitions that are valid and then just try some things out until you come up with the desired equality or what should the process of a finding a proof for a statement like this look like?
 
There isn't any foolproof method to kill all the problems you might encounter.

But, as you do more of such problems, your brain sort of figures out the structure, and clever ideas might start popping up by themselves.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K