Proof of allowed and forbidden electron state transition.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining allowed and forbidden electron state transitions by computing the expectation value of the electron's position vector, represented by the integral ∫Ψf r Ψi dτ. The participants establish that a transition from a L=1, mL=0 state to a L=0 state is allowed by showing that the integral does not equal zero. The final state is identified as the 3s state, with the wave functions Ψi and Ψf being crucial for the calculations. The importance of integrating over all spatial dimensions (r, θ, φ) is emphasized to validate the transition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically electron state transitions.
  • Familiarity with wave functions and spherical harmonics.
  • Knowledge of quantum numbers (n, L, mL) and their significance in quantum states.
  • Ability to perform integrals over three-dimensional space in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of spherical harmonics and their role in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn how to compute integrals involving wave functions in three-dimensional space.
  • Explore the significance of quantum numbers in determining allowed transitions.
  • Investigate the implications of orthonormality in wave functions for electron transitions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying atomic transitions and wave function analysis.

Send BoBs
Messages
23
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


One way to establish which transitions are forbidden is to compute the expectation value of the electron’s position vector r using wave functions for both the initial and final states in the transition. That is, compute ∫ΨfrΨidτ where τ represents an integral over all space, and Ψf and Ψi are the final and initial states. If the value of the integral is zero, then the transition is forbidden.

Use this procedure to show that a transition from a L=1, mL=0 to a L=0 state is allowed.

Homework Equations


∫ΨfrΨidτ
R21(r)=Are^(-r/2a), A=1/(a^(5/2)2√6)
Y10(θ,φ)=1/2√(3/π)cosθ

The Attempt at a Solution


Just plug in values and solve. Easy!

But wait, I don't know what ψf is. The first state is the 2p state so I can find it's wave equation but the L=0 state has no other given quantum numbers.

I know that n>0, L<n and |mL|≤L so from what is given, the final state is n>0, L=0 and mL≤0.

So what do I do about the value of n and mL? How do I find the wave equation for the final state?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If L = 0, then there is only one possible value for mL.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Send BoBs
Oops. |mL|≤L, L=0, mL=0

I believe this would be the 3s state. Time to solve the integral.
 
Last edited:
Send BoBs said:
Oops. |mL|≤L, L=0, mL=0
Yes

I believe this would be the 3s state. Time to solve the integral.
Why would n = 3? The problem statement in the first post doesn't give any information about the initial or final value of n. I believe you only need to worry about the angular integrals over ##\theta## and ##\varphi##.
 
TSny said:
Yes

Why would n = 3? The problem statement in the first post doesn't give any information about the initial or final value of n. I believe you only need to worry about the angular integrals over ##\theta## and ##\varphi##.

I believe the integral over r is also important here since the integral is over 3D space. So r ##\theta## and ##\varphi## are all important. I was going into this with the assumption that ψ(r,##\theta##,##\varphi##)=Rnl(r)Ylml(##\theta##,##\varphi##) would be how I describe each states wave equation. Of course this requires me take the quantum number n from a given chart of number configurations and results in a rather lengthy integral that already makes me think my method is wrong.

But why would the radial wave function not play a part here?
 
Send BoBs said:
But why would the radial wave function not play a part here?
There is no particular reason why the integral over r would be zero, so you can take it to be non-zero. In contrast, the integral over θ, φ can be shown to be zero except for special cases.
 
I think I have a better understanding now.

If I can show that each r,##\theta##,##\varphi## integral ≠ 0 then the transition should be valid. I know that the radial wave integral will be some non zero value and the ##\varphi## integral would just be 2π so I should be able to compute the ##\theta## integral and have my answer.
 
Send BoBs said:
If I can show that each r,##\theta##,##\varphi## integral ≠ 0 then the transition should be valid. I know that the radial wave integral will be some non zero value and the ##\varphi## integral would just be 2π so I should be able to compute the ##\theta## integral and have my answer.
That sounds good.
 
Send BoBs said:
I think I have a better understanding now.

If I can show that each r,##\theta##,##\varphi## integral ≠ 0 then the transition should be valid. I know that the radial wave integral will be some non zero value and the ##\varphi## integral would just be 2π so I should be able to compute the ##\theta## integral and have my answer.
And don't forget that the spherical harmonics are orthonormal ...
 
  • #10
kuruman said:
And don't forget that the spherical harmonics are orthonormal ...
The integral includes ##\mathbf{r}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
  • #11
DrClaude said:
The integral includes ##\mathbf{r}##.
Yes, of course. Thanks for the reminder.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K