Proof of ax=a: A Simple Proposition in Spivak's Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemistry1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The proof of the proposition ax=a, where a is a non-zero number, is established using properties from Spivak's Calculus. The proof employs the Trichotomy Law (P10), the existence of multiplicative inverses (P7), and the identity property of multiplication (P6). The proof is structured into two cases based on the sign of 'a', demonstrating that in both scenarios, the conclusion x=1 holds true. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying mathematical properties to validate the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Spivak's Calculus concepts, specifically the Trichotomy Law (P10).
  • Familiarity with the properties of multiplicative inverses (P7).
  • Knowledge of the identity property of multiplication (P6).
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills to handle equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Spivak's Calculus to deepen understanding of the Trichotomy Law and its applications.
  • Explore the concept of multiplicative inverses in various mathematical contexts.
  • Learn about algebraic proofs and the importance of step-by-step validation in mathematics.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in mathematical proofs and how to avoid them.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding algebraic proofs and the foundational principles of calculus as outlined by Spivak.

chemistry1
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
I haven't written a lot of proofs so I need the opinion of the experts on my proof of a simple proposition. Here's the various properties I used: (P10) (Trichotomy law) For every number a, one and only one of the following holds: (i) a = 0, (ii) a is in the collection P, (iii) —a is in the collection P.

(P7) For every number a not equal to 0, there is a number a^-1 such that a • a^-1 = a^-1 • a = 1.

(P6) If a is any number, then a • 1 = 1 • a = a.

If ax=a for some number "a" different from 0, then x=1.(Spivak's calculus.)

I consider two cases: a>0 or a<0. By definition (Given in Spivak's calculus) :

a>b if a-b is in the collection P (P being the collection of all positive numbers.)

a>0 because a-o is in collection P by trichotomy law(P10)

So a*x=a

by P7 a*a^-1*x= a*a^-1

1*x=1

by P6 x=1

Second case :

By definition :

a< to b if b>a

a<0 because 0>a Now, we do the same thing as the previous case.

Proposition proven !

Here's Spivak's answer

1=a^-1*a=a^-1*(a*x)=(a^-1*a)*x=1*x=x

Here's my interpretation line by line (just to be sure I am understanding it)

a^-1*a=1
a^-1*(a*x)=1 (Is my interpretation correct in saying that the number "a" can be factorized in a way that makes a=a*x, "x" being a variable which the value is to be determined)
(a^-1*a)*x=1
1*x=1
x=1

So, basically, Spivak is constructing his proof. Is it correct ?

Any opinions ? Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chemistry1 said:
So a*x=a

by P7 a*a^-1*x= a*a^-1
None of your rules would lead to the left-hand side where a^-1 appears in the middle of the previous multiplication.

Second case :
Second case of what?

a^-1*(a*x)=1 (Is my interpretation correct in saying that the number "a" can be factorized in a way that makes a=a*x, "x" being a variable which the value is to be determined)
That does not make sense. This equation is not proven at this step.

1=a^-1*a=a^-1*(a*x)=(a^-1*a)*x=1*x=x
This is right, but it hides the important step: take the initial equation a*x=x and multiply both sides by a^-1 on the left, afterwards simplify.
 
-Wait, what do you mean that my rules won't result in a*a^-1*x= a*a^-1 ? Is it only because I've put a^-1 in the middle that it isn't correct ?

-The way I thought about the proof was to justify that it would work wether we were talking about positive numbers or negative numbers, hence the the second case.

-Then did he just put the the variable "x" just like that ?

-You meant a*x=a. Also, "multiply both sides by a^-1 on the left" you meant to multiply both sides and to simplify on only the left side ? Could you rephrase?
 
No need to answer, I understand now. THank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K