Proof of Euler-Mascheroni Constant

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter coki2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proof of the relationship involving the harmonic series and the Euler-Mascheroni constant, specifically the expression relating the sum of the harmonic series to the natural logarithm and the constant. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of the properties of the harmonic series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially presents a limit involving the harmonic series and the natural logarithm, seeking proof for its correctness.
  • Another participant corrects the initial formula, indicating that the sum should be up to n and that the right-hand side does not include ln(n).
  • A subsequent reply acknowledges the correction and asks for the origin and proof of the corrected expression.
  • A participant explains that the Euler-Mascheroni constant γ is defined as the limit of the difference between the harmonic series and the natural logarithm, suggesting that proving the existence of this limit is essential.
  • Further mathematical details are provided, including integrals and comparisons to show that the limit converges and is finite.
  • Another participant inquires about the term ε_n, asking for its origin and how to calculate γ numerically.
  • A response clarifies that ε_n represents a small error term that vanishes in the limit.
  • A later reply reiterates the role of ε_n and references a source that approximates it as 1/2k, questioning why this specific factor is used and if it has a special designation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to understand the limit involving the harmonic series and the Euler-Mascheroni constant, but there are differing views on the specifics of the ε_n term and its significance, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the exact nature and calculation of the ε_n term, as well as the reasoning behind its specific approximation. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding of the mathematical concepts involved.

coki2000
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Hi PF,

I have question about harmonic series.

[tex]\lim_{n\to \infty}(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k}-ln(n))=ln(n)+\gamma +\epsilon _0[/tex]

I couldn't find any proof for that equality. Do you know its exact proof?

Thanks for helps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula is wrong. It should read sum to n in the brackets and no ln(n) in the RHS.
 
Oh, sorry you're right it should be like that

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k}=ln(n)+\gamma +\epsilon _n[/tex]

My question is where it comes from? How can we prove it?
Thanks for your correction.
 
Essentially, it comes from the fact that γ is defined to be [itex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} - \ln(n)[/itex], so the only thing that is necessary is to prove that this limit actually exists and is finite. For this, consider the following:

[tex]\begin{align*} \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k} - \ln(n) &= \sum_{k=1}^{n} \int_{k}^{k+1}\frac{1}{\lfloor x \rfloor} \ dx - \int_{1}^{n} \frac{1}{x} \\ &= \int_{1}^{n}\frac{1}{\lfloor x \rfloor} - \frac{1}{x} \ dx + \int_{n}^{n+1} \frac{1}{\lfloor x \rfloor} \ dx \\ &= \int_{1}^{n} \frac{x-\lfloor x \rfloor}{x \lfloor x \rfloor} \ dx + \frac{1}{n} \end{align*}[/tex]

Now, as n→∞, 1/n → 0, and the integral on the left converges to:

[tex]\int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{x-\lfloor x \rfloor}{x \lfloor x \rfloor} \ dx[/tex]

But this integral is finite, since:

[tex]\frac{x-\lfloor x \rfloor}{x \lfloor x \rfloor} \leq \frac{1}{\lfloor x \rfloor^{2}}[/tex]

And:

[tex]\int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\lfloor x \rfloor^{2}} \ dx = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} < \infty[/tex]
 
@Citan Uzuki

Thank you very much for your enlightening response. But what about the term [itex]\epsilon_n[/itex]. Where it comes from? And also how can we calculate γ numerically?
 
The epsilon is a very small number accounting for the error which disappears when taking the limit.
 
dextercioby said:
The epsilon is a very small number accounting for the error which disappears when taking the limit.
In this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_series_(mathematics)#Rate_of_divergence", it says that [itex]\epsilon_k[/itex] is approximately 1/2k so I wonder why Euler inserted this factor into this equality and how he found that it is approximately 1/2k(not 1/5k for example). And is there any special name for that epsilon factor?

Thanks for all your helps :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K