Proof of Fraction Position in Countable Set of Positive Rational Numbers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the position of a fraction m/n within the enumeration of positive rational numbers. The enumeration is structured in a specific order, and the task is to demonstrate that the fraction appears at a calculated position based on a given formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss counting the number of terms preceding m/n in the enumeration, with some suggesting a general form for the number of terms based on the sum of m and n.
  • There are attempts to define sets of terms corresponding to specific values of m+n and to identify patterns in the number of terms for each sum.
  • Questions arise about how to account for terms within specific sums and how to correctly identify the position of m/n in relation to these terms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various approaches to count terms and identify patterns. Some have suggested potential corrections and refinements to earlier posts, while others express uncertainty about their reasoning. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of inquiry are being pursued.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on understanding the enumeration and the relationships between the terms.

gutnedawg
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the fraction m/n occurs in position
\frac{m^2 +2mn + n^2 - m -3n}{2}

of the enumeration {1/1, 1/2, 2/1, 1/3, 2/2, 3/1,...}

of the set Q+ of positive rational numbers. (Hint: Count how many terms precede m/n in the enumeration.)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to 'prove' this. But what I know is that Q is countable so I know that if I can count to a position j and plug in the m and n into the above formula I will get j.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i would start by seeiong if you can finde a general form for the number of terms for a given m+n eg.
m+n = 2 gives 1/1, so there is 1 term
m+n = 3 gives 1/2, 2/1, 1/3, so there is 3 terms
 
Last edited:
could I write that:

m+n=a_j and call this a set with a_j elements

then create a position set {{1/1},{1/2,2/1},{1/3,2/2,3/1},...} that is a_0,a_1,a_2 etc...

the position would be the addition of the number of elements in a_0+a_1+a_2...

I don't know where I'm going with this
 
ok so let p = m+n, and N_p, be the number of terms corresponding to p
for
p = 2, gives 1/1, so N_2 = 1
p = 3, gives 1/2, 2/1, so N_3 = 2
p = 4, gives 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, so N_3 = 3

spotting any pattern, then consider summing over p to account for the term with p<m+n, whilst you'll need to account for the p=m+n terms before the term separately

note the correction to the original post as well (N_3 case)
 
Last edited:
lanedance said:
ok so let p = m+n, and N_p, be the number of terms corresponding to p
for
p = 2, gives 1/1, so N_2 = 1
p = 3, gives 1/2, 2/1, so N_3 = 2
p = 4, gives 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, so N_3 = 3

spotting any pattern, then consider summing over p to account for the term with p<m+n, whilst you'll need to account for the p=m+n terms before the term separately

note the correction to the original post as well (N_3 case)


Yea this was what I was trying to get at however you put it much more elegantly... My question before was how could I 'count' the number that come before m/n in a specific p. IE 3/1 is at position 5 we know p=2 + p=3 =3 but how can I include the fact that 1/3 and 2/2 come before 3/1 within the p=4
 
I would first start by attempting the part I have given

gutnedawg said:
Yea this was what I was trying to get at however you put it much more elegantly... My question before was how could I 'count' the number that come before m/n in a specific p. IE 3/1 is at position 5 we know p=2 + p=3 =3 but how can I include the fact that 1/3 and 2/2 come before 3/1 within the p=4

for this look at the ordering of the terms and compare to m & n and try and spot a pattern
 
I think it's N_p+m correct?
 
what is?
 
what I was thinking is incorrect... I'm just not seeing a pattern that would give me what I need
 
  • #10
the pattern is as follows:
M N
1 1
1 2
2 1
1 3
2 2
3 1
1 4
2 3
3 2
4 1

Use that formula and you'll see that it calculates the 0 based index correctly for the above.

Then with induction:
let P(m,n) be the position
P(m,n) = big equation.

Now, we have to prove that P(m+1,n-1) = P(m,n) + 1

Write it out and you will see that it's provable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K