Proof of Haldane's Binomial Expansion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gnome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Expansion
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
gnome
Messages
1,031
Reaction score
1
The next-to-last step in the proof on pg 1 of this article

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0006-3444%28194511%2933%3A3%3C222%3AOAMOEF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Whttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0006-3444%28194511%2933%3A3%3C222%3AOAMOEF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W

makes this substitution

[tex]\sum_{r=0}^\infty \binom {m+r-2}{r} q^r = (1-q)^{1-m}[/tex]

I don't see it. How does
[tex](1-q)^{1-m} = \sum_{r=0}^\infty \binom{1-m}{r} (-q)^r[/tex]
or
[tex](1-q)^{1-m} = \sum_{r=0}^\infty \binom{1-m}{r} (-q)^{1-m-r}[/tex]
transform to the expression given by Haldane?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I just remembered that this m is always a positive integer so (1-m) is 0 or negative.

The key to this must be here...

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NegativeBinomialSeries.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator: