Proof of n(n-1)/2 as the Number of 2-Subsets in an n-Set

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ella087
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the number of 2-subsets of an n-set A is accurately represented by the formula n(n-1)/2. The proof by induction begins with the assumption that the formula holds for a set of size n and extends to a set of size n+1 by considering the addition of a new element. The inductive step demonstrates that the total number of 2-subsets can be expressed as the sum of the existing subsets plus the new combinations formed with the new element. This approach validates the formula through logical reasoning and combinatorial principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with combinatorial concepts
  • Basic knowledge of set theory
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study mathematical induction techniques in depth
  • Explore combinatorial proofs and their applications
  • Learn about set theory and its fundamental principles
  • Practice problems involving combinations and subsets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in discrete mathematics, and anyone interested in understanding combinatorial proofs and set theory concepts.

Ella087
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Prove by induction that the number of 2-subsets of an n-set A equals n(n-1)/2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ella087 said:
Prove by induction that the number of 2-subsets of an n-set A equals n(n-1)/2.

Not sure why you want to use induction to do this but here you go in a fast and loose manner:

Assume it's true for a set of size n. Examine a set of size n+1. Notice this set of size n+1 is just an n-set with a new element added to it. Call that new element 'A'. Now what does a 2-subset of the n+1-set look like? Either it has A or it doesn't. Thus, using our inductive hypothesis, we see there are:

\frac{n*(n-1)}{2} + n = \frac{(n+1)*n}{2}

2-subsets. And that's exactly what we want to see.
 
you mean, considering a set of n elements the number of subsets with 2 elements obtained from that set is equal to n(n-1)/2?
 
if so, it is easy to see that the first combine with n-1 elements, the second with n-2 elements, and so on
 
al-mahed said:
if so, it is easy to see that the first combine with n-1 elements, the second with n-2 elements, and so on
Yes That gives a direct formula but what the poster needed was a step for an inductive proof which is what Rodigee gave since the new element (n+1) combines with the first n elements to form n more sets of two elements.
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K