MHB Proof of Parallelogram ABCD: Midpoint X & Y Show Area $\frac{1}{4}$

mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
ABCD is a parallelogram . X is the midpoint of AD & Y is the midpoint of BC. Show that the area of $\triangle {ABX}$ is $\frac{1}{4}$ the area of ABCD

View attachment 6102

Can you help me with this proof ? were should i start ? I think It should be by proving

$\triangle{DBC} \cong \triangle{DBA} $ using SAS as DB is a common side DC= AB as ABCD is a parallelogram, $\angle {BDC} = \angle{DBA} $ alternate angles

And I can also predict that the use of midpoint theorem here

Many Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • pargram.png
    pargram.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 132
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Start by constructing segment XY. What can be said about triangles ABX and XYB?
 
Another way: Draw the perpendicular to AB from X. Show, using "similar triangles", that its length is half the length of the perpendicular to AB from D. The result follows immediately from the formulas for the areas of triangle and parallelogram.
 
greg1313 said:
Start by constructing segment XY. What can be said about triangles ABX and XYB?

They are congruent! But how can they be proved using $SSS$ or $SAS$ or $AAS$

View attachment 6104

Many Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • pargram.png
    pargram.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 114
I'd use SSS.
 
I wonder what are the uses of joing the two midpoints of the sides x & y.

It helps to state that,

AX=XD
& BY=YC

And can AB=XY be or DC=XY be said using the midpoint theorem?

Many Thanks :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top