Proof of Strictly Upper Triangular Matrix Property by James

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving properties of strictly upper triangular matrices, specifically that the (i,j)-th entry of the square of such a matrix A is zero if i is greater than or equal to j - 1. The proof demonstrates that for these indices, there are no valid k values that satisfy the necessary conditions for the sum to be non-zero. Additionally, a related problem is addressed, showing that if the (i,j)-th entry of the product AB is zero for certain indices, it leads to the conclusion that A raised to the n-th power equals zero. The overall conclusion emphasizes the behavior of strictly upper triangular matrices under multiplication and their nilpotent nature.
jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I need help with this proof relating to strictly upper-triangular
matrices.

Let A be an n x n strictly upper triangular matrix. Then the (i,j-th
entry of AA = A^2 is 0 if i >= j - 1.

Here's what I have.

Pf: Let B = A^2. The (i,j)-th entry of B is given by

b_{ij} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{ik} a_{kj}.

If k >= j, a_{kj} = 0. If i >= k, a_{ik} = 0. If i >= j - 1, then there
is no k s.t. i < k < j. Therefore

b_ij = \sum_{i<k, k<j} a_{ik} b_{kj} ==> b_{ij} = 0.

Also, if anyone has any clues on these related problems, it would be
greatly appreciated.

Suppose p is a given integer satisfying 1 <= p <= n -1 and that the
entries b_{kj} of an n x n matrix B satisfy b_{kj} = 0 for k >= j - p.
Show that the (i,j)-th entry of the product AB is zero if i >= j -
(p+1). Deduce from the previous result that A^n = 0.

James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just look at, say a 3x3 strictly uppwer triangular matirx and square it and then cube it, then raise it to the 4'th power. what happens to the entries? prove it happens in general.
 
,

Your proof for the strictly upper triangular matrix property is correct. You have correctly shown that the (i,j)-th entry of AA is 0 if i >= j - 1. This is because for i >= j - 1, there is no k such that i < k < j, therefore the sum \sum_{i<k, k<j} a_{ik} b_{kj} is equal to 0.

For the related problem, we can use a similar proof technique. Let B = AB where A is a strictly upper triangular matrix and B is an n x n matrix with entries b_{kj}. Then, the (i,j)-th entry of B is given by b_{ij} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{ik} b_{kj}. We can show that if i >= j - (p+1), then there is no k such that i < k < j - p. Therefore, the sum \sum_{i<k, k<j-p} a_{ik} b_{kj} is equal to 0. This means that the (i,j)-th entry of B is also equal to 0, and thus A^n = 0. This is because B = A^p * A^{n-p} = 0 * A^{n-p} = 0.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
871
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K