Proof of the implicit and inverse function theorems

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 8K views
r4nd0m
Messages
96
Reaction score
1
Today I revised my knowledge from multivariable calculus and I found that I couldn't remember the proofs of these two theorems. Then I looked in Rudin, and everything was clear.
Except one thing, which probably made me forgot the proofs. There are two weird functions in these two proofs: [tex]\phi(x) = x + A^{-1} (y-f(x))[/tex] and [tex]F(x,y) = (f(x,y),y)[/tex].
I can see how they are used and that it really works, but I don't really understand what do the functions really say, if you know what I mean. How did someone figure out that these are the right functions we should use in the proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hard to tell what you exactly mean without seeing the proofs. However, ##F(x,y)=(f(x,y),y)## is a standard construction when dealing with the implicit function theorem, i.e. it is the implicit function theorem!

The first function is something like a derivative: ##A= \dfrac{y-f(x)}{\phi(x)-x}##, so again a standard quotient to consider.