Proof of the implicit and inverse function theorems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implicit and inverse function theorems as revisited through the lens of multivariable calculus, specifically referencing the work of Walter Rudin. The functions \(\phi(x) = x + A^{-1} (y-f(x))\) and \(F(x,y) = (f(x,y),y)\) are highlighted as critical components in the proofs of these theorems. The construction of \(F(x,y)\) is identified as a standard approach in the context of the implicit function theorem, while \(\phi(x)\) serves a derivative-like role in the analysis. Understanding these functions is essential for grasping the proofs and applications of the theorems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Multivariable calculus concepts
  • Understanding of the implicit function theorem
  • Familiarity with derivatives and their applications
  • Knowledge of Walter Rudin's mathematical texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proofs of the implicit function theorem in Walter Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis"
  • Explore the applications of the inverse function theorem in multivariable calculus
  • Investigate the role of derivatives in the context of implicit functions
  • Review examples of standard constructions in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on multivariable calculus, as well as researchers looking to deepen their understanding of the implicit and inverse function theorems.

r4nd0m
Messages
96
Reaction score
1
Today I revised my knowledge from multivariable calculus and I found that I couldn't remember the proofs of these two theorems. Then I looked in Rudin, and everything was clear.
Except one thing, which probably made me forgot the proofs. There are two weird functions in these two proofs: [tex]\phi(x) = x + A^{-1} (y-f(x))[/tex] and [tex]F(x,y) = (f(x,y),y)[/tex].
I can see how they are used and that it really works, but I don't really understand what do the functions really say, if you know what I mean. How did someone figure out that these are the right functions we should use in the proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hard to tell what you exactly mean without seeing the proofs. However, ##F(x,y)=(f(x,y),y)## is a standard construction when dealing with the implicit function theorem, i.e. it is the implicit function theorem!

The first function is something like a derivative: ##A= \dfrac{y-f(x)}{\phi(x)-x}##, so again a standard quotient to consider.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K