Proof on a property of Riemann integrals

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
kidmode01
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f be continuous on [a,b] and suppose that [tex]f(x) \geq 0[/tex] for all x Є [a,b]
Prove that if there exists a point c Є [a,b] such that [tex]f(c) > 0[/tex], then

[tex]\int_{a}^{b} f > 0[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Using my books notation,

Suppose P = {x0,x1,...,xn} is a partition of [a,b]. For each i = 1,...,n we let:
[tex]M_i(f) = sup\{f(x) : x \epsilon [x_{i-1},x_i]\}[/tex]
[tex]m_i(f) = inf\{f(x) : x \epsilon [x_{i-1},x_i]\}[/tex]

The upper sum of f with respect to P: U(f,P)
The lower sum of f with respect to P: L(f,P)

The upper integral of f on [a,b]: U(f) = inf{ U(f,P) : P is a partition of [a,b] }
The lower integral of f on [a,b]: L(f) = sup{ L(f,P) : P is a partition of [a,b] }

Suppose there exists a c Є [a,b] such that f(c) > 0 then
there exists a [tex]m_i(f) > 0[/tex]
thus L(f,P) > 0

but then L(f) > 0, but since f is Riemann integrable:

[tex]0 < L(f) = U(f) = \int_{a}^{b} f[/tex]

I know I'm kinda leaving out some details but is the outline alright? I have a feeling it's wrong since it was really short...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks pretty decent to me.
 
I should also include:

[tex]\Delta x_i = x_i - x_{i-1}[/tex]

[tex]U(f,P) = \sum_{i=1}^n M_i \Delta x_i[/tex]
[tex]L(f,P) = \sum_{i=1}^n m_i \Delta x_i[/tex]